As Gawker points out, German artist Edgar Müller’s 3-D crevasse is a cheaper alternative to something like Olafur Eliasson’s man-made waterfalls which cost an estimated $15.5 million. Thoughts?
Related post: Is Critical Darling Olafur Eliasson Just a Crowd-Pleaser?
“ Cassavates-Rowlands (and Gazzara, Falk) Kurosawa-Mifune Ford-Wayne Fellini-Mastroianni... ” posted on Directors and Their On-Screen Muses on
“ Should have got your Blue ringer T-shirt at EZopolis, you would have paid less. Just saying. :) ” posted on Flavorpill's Guide to DIY Pop-Culture Halloween Costumes #3: Film on
“ How is The National not on here? Practically every song on Sad Songs for Dirty Lovers would fit... ” posted on 10 Songs to Soundtrack Your Romantic Crisis on
“ Mark Stern,existential psychologists,existential psychologists boston,existential... ” posted on images4 on
“ Johnny & Tim ” posted on Directors and Their On-Screen Muses on
Comments (2)
Too cool. As someone who has spent 30yrs studying visual images, this was great. Thanks for showing us.
wow, stunning. and yeah, bloomberg should feel like a chump after seeing something as visually remarkable as it is affordable.
Post a new comment