<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: Redefining Urban Art at the Auction House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flavorwire.com/18899/exclusive-redefining-urban-art-at-the-auction-house/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flavorwire.com/18899/exclusive-redefining-urban-art-at-the-auction-house</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: haloxyl eye serum</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/18899/exclusive-redefining-urban-art-at-the-auction-house/comment-page-1#comment-49586</link>
		<dc:creator>haloxyl eye serum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=18899#comment-49586</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading your entries right through my morning holiday, and I will have to admit the entire article has been very enlightening and really well written. I assumed I would help you know that for some reason why this blog does not view smartly in Internet Explorer 8. I desire Microsoft could stop changing their software. I have a question for you. May you thoughts changing blog roll hyperlinks? That would be in reality neat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading your entries right through my morning holiday, and I will have to admit the entire article has been very enlightening and really well written. I assumed I would help you know that for some reason why this blog does not view smartly in Internet Explorer 8. I desire Microsoft could stop changing their software. I have a question for you. May you thoughts changing blog roll hyperlinks? That would be in reality neat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hunger</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/18899/exclusive-redefining-urban-art-at-the-auction-house/comment-page-1#comment-5258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hunger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=18899#comment-5258</guid>
		<description>Um first of all man - they are &quot;pieces&quot; not &quot;peaces.&quot;  Secondly Banksy is ok but Barry McGhee or Faile aren&#039;t? Banksy doesn&#039;t have the balls to show his face in public - he didn&#039;t even execute his last New York thing - he hired an ADVERTISING COMPANY that specializes in outdoor advertising murals.   
 
So if you&#039;re right in your tirade, Warhol was full of shit as was Lichtenstein as was Basquiat.  Art is what art is - so it feels like advertising - so what? When people first saw Picasso&#039;s abstract work they thought he was nuts for going in that direction -  when Dylan picked up an electric guitar everyone said he was done, when Steven Shore was the first artists to show color photography in a museum people freaked out -in fact back in day photographers like Ansel Adams, Minor White and Dorothea Lang had to fight to be recognized as artists at all.  You sound like someone who is yelling sell out because of change. You don&#039;t have to like it but I assure you it is art. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um first of all man &#8211; they are &quot;pieces&quot; not &quot;peaces.&quot;  Secondly Banksy is ok but Barry McGhee or Faile aren&#039;t? Banksy doesn&#039;t have the balls to show his face in public &#8211; he didn&#039;t even execute his last New York thing &#8211; he hired an ADVERTISING COMPANY that specializes in outdoor advertising murals.   </p>
<p>So if you&#039;re right in your tirade, Warhol was full of shit as was Lichtenstein as was Basquiat.  Art is what art is &#8211; so it feels like advertising &#8211; so what? When people first saw Picasso&#039;s abstract work they thought he was nuts for going in that direction &#8211;  when Dylan picked up an electric guitar everyone said he was done, when Steven Shore was the first artists to show color photography in a museum people freaked out -in fact back in day photographers like Ansel Adams, Minor White and Dorothea Lang had to fight to be recognized as artists at all.  You sound like someone who is yelling sell out because of change. You don&#039;t have to like it but I assure you it is art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/18899/exclusive-redefining-urban-art-at-the-auction-house/comment-page-1#comment-5064</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=18899#comment-5064</guid>
		<description>Street Art? Not so much IMO. This art is intertwined with consumerism and based on billboards, paper ads and television promoting products and peddling nonsense.  It&#039;s monkey/zombie art and it&#039;s disposable. It&#039;s like I&#039;m looking at a advertisement. These guys (mentioned in the article) for the most part don&#039;t have a message. In fact instead of &quot;street art&quot; a better term is &quot;advertisement art&quot;. With the sidewalks littered with there logo for fame, money and recognition I&#039;m not seeing art. I&#039;m seeing bullshit straight up.    
 
On the &quot;fine art&quot; tip when these guys leave the confines of being to scared to use paint in public it&#039;s the opposite of street, underground, outsider or whatever you want to call it. It&#039;s no different than a pretty picture of a flower or a couple of Frenchies sipping drinks at a cafe. It&#039;s modern cute pop shit. That said I obviously don&#039;t include Writer/Peacers with these sticker/poster guys. That be like lumping Robert Plant in with Kanye West. I am interested in seeing what other artists are in this show for that reason.  
 
..and it&#039;s no suprise the Auction houses are pushing it trendy art. There&#039;s a huge market for it.  WOrd to Banksy. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Street Art? Not so much IMO. This art is intertwined with consumerism and based on billboards, paper ads and television promoting products and peddling nonsense.  It&#039;s monkey/zombie art and it&#039;s disposable. It&#039;s like I&#039;m looking at a advertisement. These guys (mentioned in the article) for the most part don&#039;t have a message. In fact instead of &quot;street art&quot; a better term is &quot;advertisement art&quot;. With the sidewalks littered with there logo for fame, money and recognition I&#039;m not seeing art. I&#039;m seeing bullshit straight up.    </p>
<p>On the &quot;fine art&quot; tip when these guys leave the confines of being to scared to use paint in public it&#039;s the opposite of street, underground, outsider or whatever you want to call it. It&#039;s no different than a pretty picture of a flower or a couple of Frenchies sipping drinks at a cafe. It&#039;s modern cute pop shit. That said I obviously don&#039;t include Writer/Peacers with these sticker/poster guys. That be like lumping Robert Plant in with Kanye West. I am interested in seeing what other artists are in this show for that reason.  </p>
<p>..and it&#039;s no suprise the Auction houses are pushing it trendy art. There&#039;s a huge market for it.  WOrd to Banksy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acadia</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/18899/exclusive-redefining-urban-art-at-the-auction-house/comment-page-1#comment-5057</link>
		<dc:creator>acadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=18899#comment-5057</guid>
		<description>After reading the article today on my walk to work or to grocery store I will look for signs of street art in my neighborhood. I will look with a new eye.  
It was a good interview, highlighting a few unique local artists so I may dig further, along with the discussion on definition Street or Urban art. The POV on the buying public and the auction as leveler was interesting. I had never thought of the role of auction vs gallery that way.   Also I found the question posed and responses on the relevance of galleries today very engaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the article today on my walk to work or to grocery store I will look for signs of street art in my neighborhood. I will look with a new eye.<br />
It was a good interview, highlighting a few unique local artists so I may dig further, along with the discussion on definition Street or Urban art. The POV on the buying public and the auction as leveler was interesting. I had never thought of the role of auction vs gallery that way.   Also I found the question posed and responses on the relevance of galleries today very engaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 4/13 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: assets.flavorwire.com

Served from: flavorwire.com @ 2012-02-10 05:29:51 -->
