• Flavorwire is part of the Flavorpill network
  • City Guides:
  • New York
  • Los Angeles
  • San Francisco
  • Chicago
  • London
  • More from Flavorpill:
  • Daily Dose
  • Earplug
  • Artkrush
  • Boldtype
  • ThumbnailPhoto Gallery: Barnstormers Raid Chelsea »
  • ThumbnailShort and Sweet: 35 TV Openers That Make Us Feel Like Kids Again »
  • ThumbnailExclusive: Todd Oldham on Joan Jett and The Runaways' Fashion Legacy »

Flavorwire

  • Follow us
  • RSS
  • Flavorpill on Twitter
  • Flavorpill on Facebook
  • Flickr: Flavorpill's Photostream
DesignDavid Chipperfield David Fisher Frank Gehry Juha Ilonen Lehman Brothers Nicolai Ouroussoff Zaha Hadid
Wow Archictecture Won’t Disappear, It Will Just Move On — And Maybe That’s a Good Thing
11:50 am Tuesday Nov 11, 2008 by Caroline Stanley

About a month after LEHMAN BROTHERS wowed us by filing for bankruptcy, ZAHA HADID’s traveling CHANEL PAVILION, an elaborate fiberglass structure emulating Chanel’s classic 2.55 purse, landed on Central Park’s Rumsey Playfield.

New York Times writer NICOLAI OUROUSSOFF followed up the haute couture attack with a scathing review that began: “The wild, delirious ride that architecture has been on for the last decade looks as if it’s finally coming to an end. And after a visit to the Chanel Pavilion…you may think it hasn’t come soon enough.”

British architect, DAVID CHIPPERFIELD, agrees. In an interview with Bloomberg.com, he defined “Wow architecture” as “an architecture of excess, a consequence of there being too much money around.” He gambles that “we will see a mood shift — a certain sensibility coming back.”

While he may be right about projects in his native UK or even here in the United States, there are other countries who are finding the energy, space, and most importantly, the glorious dough to build big. “Form follows finance,” said ARCHITECTURAL RECORD’s DAVID SOKOL as he pointed to Dubai’s “blowout of mega-palaces for the new fossil-fuel plutocrats.”

Speaking of Dubai and mega-palaces, have you heard of the Dynamic Tower? No big deal. It’s just an 80-story building with floors rotating independent of an another, each completing a 360-degree rotation every 90 minutes. The brain-child of Italian architect DAVID FISHER, the time-based structure touts itself green with 79 wind turbines fitted between each floor.

Then there’s China, whose architecture explosion tooted a horn or two at the Beijing Olympics this past Summer. “In Beijing, architecture has become a spectator sport,” explains Record’s Clifford A. Pearson. With buildings such as HERZOG and DE MEURON’s National Stadium — otherwise known as the Bird’s Nest — and OMA’s CCTV tower, China’s glowing city is the newest beacon of the avant-garde.

Helsinki has been grappling with the draw of Wow-architecture, starry-eyed at what celebrity architect FRANK GEHRY did for Bilbao with the Guggenheim Museum and PEKKA KORIPEN, Helsnki’s Mayor for City Planning and Real Estate wants some iconic structures stat. However, Finnish architects have been known to turn up their noses at the international trend. Architect JUHA ILONEN notes, “Wow-architecture is all about dazzling and astonishing people with the mere shell of the edifice. It takes no account of the deeper significance of the building.” Like, its context.

America will most likely be granted another go-round at glitz and glamor, but our question is: should we really get on that carousel again? Or are the most interesting projects the ones that have to work a little harder to get our attention?

- Jessamyn Farkas

1 comment
Email to a friendEmail to a friend TwitterTweet FacebookFacebook Digg thisDigg StumbleUponStumbleUpon
  1. How to Survive an Economic Downturn and Alienate People
  2. SANAA Transforms the Serpentine Gallery Pavilion Into a Hall of Mirrors
  3. Good Design Part 2: Revenge of the Nerds

One Response

Ashmud • November 11th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

I visited the Chanel Pavilion and all i got was this stupid… um… actually, I didn’t get anything. Well, maybe a few shell shots and a tap on the shoulder asking me to please back off. But, considering the times, this brand of esoterica art strikes me as callous and irritating. I’m looking forward to a new movement that’s conscious of the scale of its endeavors.

Post a new comment



Displayed next to your comments.



If you have a website, link to it here.

« Previous Next »
Get your Daily Dose of culture!
    1. What’s on at Flavorpill: Links That Made the Rounds in Our Office
    1. Required Viewing: Breaking Bad’s Season 3 Premiere
    1. The 5 Best Music Videos of the Week
    1. Hipster Headlines: Food Stamps, Terry Richardson, and Novelty Yarmulkes
  • The 10 Best Young Adult Books for Grownups
    My top ten: M.T. Anderson, The Astonishing Life of Octavian Nothing, Traitor to ...
    Lars Guthrie • Sun Mar 21 at 12:35am
  • Lady Gaga Delights and Terrifies With Cultural References, Fire
    ... i dont get why the beds on fire..... at the end and why shes smocking..but d...
    Kat • Sat Mar 20 at 11:14pm
  • 10 TV Themes by Musicians You Already Know
    Destiny's Child did Disney's The Proud Family
    Mr.Proud • Sat Mar 20 at 10:01pm
  • 10 TV Themes by Musicians You Already Know
    Wayne Brady did the theme song from Disney's The Weekenders
    chugafreeze • Sat Mar 20 at 9:47pm
    Dear David Brooks, Glenn Beck is NOT the New Abbie Hoffman. Trust Us…
    The Atlantic is Bringing Fiction Back
    Why “Greenberg” is No “Annie Hall”

About Flavorpill

Flavorpill covers cultural events, art, books, music, and world news. Join now.

  • About|
  • Advertise|
  • Jobs|
  • Causes

I want to...

  • Suggest an Event »
  • Send Feedback »
  • Report a Bug »

Our Publications

  • New York »
  • San Francisco »
  • Los Angeles »
  • London »
  • Chicago »
  • Miami »
  • Artkrush »
  • Earplug »
  • Boldtype »
  • Activate »
  • Daily Dose »
Get your Daily Dose of culture!