
Image credit: DamienHirst.com
We’re accustomed to criticism of Damien Hirst over his taxidermy work, but the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals came down hard on the artist for his In and Out of Love retrospective at London’s Tate Museum. The controversial flower and fruit room was populated with butterflies, their lives shortened from months to days in captivity. The installation claimed 400 tiny lives a week over the course of five months — a reported 9,000 in total. This brought up questions. Was this a battle of animal rights vs. heartless callousness… or militant activism vs. artistic expression? Is one of world’s most powerful artists intentionally provocative or just a power-drunk jerk? Do butterflies have rights?
The 50 Books Everyone Needs to Read, 1963-2013
Actors and Directors Who Trashed the Remakes of Their Classic Movies
The 50 Greatest Summer Albums, 1963-2013
5 Great Novels That Will Mess With Your Mind
Your 'Mad Men' Season 6, Episode 12 Talking Points: Who Is Bob Benson?



