15 Movie Tie-In Book Covers That Make Us Sad

Yesterday, we spotted the cover for Scribner’s upcoming republication of The Great Gatsby, in concert with the film adaptation’s May release. The Great Gatsby is one of those books with a cover so iconic that any change to it offends our delicate sensibilities, but even with that self-awareness, the image got us thinking about other movie (and TV) tie-in editions of books, and how truly awful — not to mention unfaithful to the original text — they can be. That said, there’s no denying that movie tie-in editions sell books, so we guess there’s a light at the end of the tunnel. We just wish there were another way.

url-1528431_506569139385506_1114455028_n

The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald

Now this isn’t the worst movie tie-in we’ve ever seen — at least it sort of references Gatsby’s glitz and Coralie Bickford-Smith’s Fitzgerald cover series — but it still looks rather cheap, and dare we say, deco-steampunk-y. Not quite the right direction.

url-3url-2

The Hobbit, J.R.R. Tolkien

These two are polar opposites: lo-fi, classic, and beautiful vs. glowing with digital augmentation. Guess which we prefer (and which we think reflects the tone of the book)?

url-6Wizard Earthsea 01

A Wizard of Earthsea, Ursula K. Le Guin

Ursula K. Le Guin’s classic has seen a lot of covers over the years, most of them weird and beautiful. This one, which advertises the miniseries that Le Guin hated, looks like the box of a bad video game. Sigh.

125611url-8

Solaris, Stanislaw Lem

Yikes. Here’s George Clooney making out on the cover of Stanislaw Lem’s incredibly cerebral 1961 Polish science fiction novel. Of the film, the author wrote, “I only wanted to create a vision of a human encounter with something that certainly exists, in a mighty manner perhaps, but cannot be reduced to human concepts, ideas or images.  This is why the book was entitled Solaris and not Love in Outer Space.

url-15url-16

Dead Until Dark, Charlaine Harris

This writer admits that she has never read the Sookie Stackhouse novels, nor seen True Blood, but to a layman this book’s vibe just went from cheeky, whimsical fantasy to boring, exploitative YA.

cloud atlasurl-9

Cloud Atlas, David Mitchell

We think the original cover gets the “ensemble piece” message across much more gracefully. It’s like the book in that way.

url-10url-11

The Road, Cormac McCarthy

We get that the desaturated film still is supposed to look bleak, but nothing’s bleaker — or truer to the book — than that original black.

urlurl-1

The Time Machine, H.G. Wells

H.G. Wells’s classic has seen many covers over the ages, and not all of them good. Still, we don’t think it deserves to look as cheap and dated as it does here (in 2002!).

url-12Never Let Me Go film book

Never Let Me Go, Kazuo Ishiguro

Why does the movie tie-in edition make this book look like a fluffy piece of chick lit instead of the weird, harrowing, dystopic masterpiece it truly is?

url-14url-13

Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë

This cover isn’t even a tie-in to a film adaptation of Wuthering Heights – it’s something much more horrible: a rather tasteless tie-in to the entire Twilight franchise. We may be in the minority here, but nothing would make us less likely to pick up a book than a sticker calling it “Bella & Edward’s Favorite Book.” Yikes.

url-18url-17

Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen

We think the Penguin Classics cover has the focus right. Get off our books, Kiera Knightley.

I Robot first edition cover  Gnome Pressurl-7

I, Robot, Isaac Asimov

Okay, so the first edition of Asimov’s classic kind of has an Iron Giant thing going on (although remember which came first), but we still much prefer it to the completely trashy-looking Will Smith version. That’s no way to treat a giant of sci-fi literature.

url-20url-21

Revolutionary Road, Richard Yates

The movie tie-in edition of this novel makes it look like a love story, which it isn’t (mark the directionals of the figures on each cover). It’s sort of the opposite. Also, doesn’t the copy look like it’s telling us the book is starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet?

url-4url-5

A Game of Thrones, George R.R. Martin

There’s nothing all that special about the original cover for the first book in Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series (though the UK cover is much nicer), but that still doesn’t mean we want our books turned into posters for the HBO show. We’d much rather have the simple iconography.

url-22American-Psycho-poster

American Psycho, Bret Easton Ellis

The first edition cover is so upsetting, and so iconic. The film tie-in version is so pulpy, and so ’80s.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
ChrisSpeare 5 pts

I think the second cover is perfect. It Illustrates perfectly Ned Stark's reluctance to do what needs to be done to win the 'Game of Thrones'.

Superabound 56 pts

The original Game of Thrones cover is shit and barely looks any different from the HBO update

KathleenG 6 pts

These are all pretty terrible. Especially "Great Gastby," which completely ruins Coralie Bickford-Smith's covers.

 

Like "Game of Thrones," the Charlaine Harris book cover refers to the HBO series. Also annoying is even the new Harris hardcovers (which continue with the original art) have a big fake sticker promoting the series, which just ruins it.

 

"Hobbit" doesn't especially bother me. But I guess maybe it's just because they could have made it a lot worse with multiple actors (like "Great Gastby" or "Cloud Atlas").... 

SignedUpForOneComment 5 pts

The Game of Thrones cover is better (you were really stretching there) and I honestly think the Pride and Prejudice one is better too, purists be damned. Just because they're movie/TV covers doesn't automatically make them worst than the ones which came before which seems to be the basis of your reasoning. 

jameskkaiser 6 pts

The only one I prefer over the original is Game of Thrones. The original cover looked like a tacky love novel based in the medieval times.

metalfalsetto 5 pts

That original American Psycho cover is a Francis Bacon painting, no? Geez, talk about two steps back.

mattsg88 9 pts

Frankly, I'd rather have the movie cover than the normal cover with the blurb declaring SOON TO BE A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE! printed on it. (You know, the ones that don't peel off.)

 

 

JoeRichardson 5 pts

 mattsg88 This comment made me pass out, fall down the stairs and into a vat of boiling acid

mattsg88 9 pts

 JoeRichardson The goggles! The did nothing!!

BeckyReynolds2 5 pts

The cover I disliked most was the one used for Boy in the Striped Pyjamas after the film came out. To be fair, it wasn't really the cover itself that I disliked, just that they used a pictorial cover at all. The blurb on my edition says something about believing it is important to begin reading the book without knowing what it is going to be about. Highly unusual and entirely appropriate. I wish they'd retained that.