<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Are the 10 Best Movies of the Decade?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-18130</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-18130</guid>
		<description>City of God, anyone? The Lives of Others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City of God, anyone? The Lives of Others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-18123</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-18123</guid>
		<description>what about sleuth? the 2007 one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about sleuth? the 2007 one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-18101</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-18101</guid>
		<description>NO, no, no. Hi all, British man here. It&#039;s got nothing to do with differing tastes between Brits and Yanks.

The Times is an upper class rag with no idea and no connection with popular culture in the Uk.

Where are the Tarentino movies? Where are the Lord of the rings? There are many movies missing from the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, no, no. Hi all, British man here. It&#8217;s got nothing to do with differing tastes between Brits and Yanks.</p>
<p>The Times is an upper class rag with no idea and no connection with popular culture in the Uk.</p>
<p>Where are the Tarentino movies? Where are the Lord of the rings? There are many movies missing from the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel D.</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-16211</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-16211</guid>
		<description>who the hell wrote this list?  this is the best films of the decade for dummies -- or what?!
 
Best movies have to be on a list because of what they are but also what they represent and how they affect other filmakers.  

BRICK...   Mysterious Skin...   Amelie...  Donnie Darko...   Frida...   Eternal Sunshine....   so many ... but none on the list above!!! 

I agree with Kate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who the hell wrote this list?  this is the best films of the decade for dummies &#8212; or what?!</p>
<p>Best movies have to be on a list because of what they are but also what they represent and how they affect other filmakers.  </p>
<p>BRICK&#8230;   Mysterious Skin&#8230;   Amelie&#8230;  Donnie Darko&#8230;   Frida&#8230;   Eternal Sunshine&#8230;.   so many &#8230; but none on the list above!!! </p>
<p>I agree with Kate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-15371</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-15371</guid>
		<description>Pulp fiction=90&#039;s so can&#039;t be on the list, but I agree with 1st post the list seems a very odd (Team America=4???? how did that even happen), and you can tell they tried to appease every demographic and created a half-ass list which seems like they just picked a whole bunch of big movies and randomly ordered them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pulp fiction=90&#8242;s so can&#8217;t be on the list, but I agree with 1st post the list seems a very odd (Team America=4???? how did that even happen), and you can tell they tried to appease every demographic and created a half-ass list which seems like they just picked a whole bunch of big movies and randomly ordered them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda V.</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-14964</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-14964</guid>
		<description>Pulp Fiction should be at the top of this list !!!! It&#039;s a classic in every cinematic sense of the word... Even if you have seen it once or a thousand times.  Bruce Willis, John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson, and the madman/genius of a director, Quentin Tarantino are at the peak of their game with this one....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pulp Fiction should be at the top of this list !!!! It&#8217;s a classic in every cinematic sense of the word&#8230; Even if you have seen it once or a thousand times.  Bruce Willis, John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson, and the madman/genius of a director, Quentin Tarantino are at the peak of their game with this one&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/48911/what-are-the-10-best-movies-of-the-decade/comment-page-1#comment-14845</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=48911#comment-14845</guid>
		<description>This is really the silliest list I&#039;ve seen thus far. This is my tweet as soon as I saw it:
http://twitter.com/katetropa/status/5536412772

And to elaborate further:
Napoleon Dynamite (not ranked); Wedding Crashers actually makes it IN the list, ranking 90 OVER Battle Royal/Amores Perros/ House of Flying Daggers/An Inconvenient Truth.
Surely they jest.

The Royal Tenenbaums at 88?? (and the only W.Andersen)
Memento at 68?! This is a groundbreaking film.
Brick (not ranked)

And then:
BAD SANTA?? at 54?? 
Knocked Up?? at 49??

I am done with this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really the silliest list I&#8217;ve seen thus far. This is my tweet as soon as I saw it:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/katetropa/status/5536412772" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/katetropa/status/5536412772</a></p>
<p>And to elaborate further:<br />
Napoleon Dynamite (not ranked); Wedding Crashers actually makes it IN the list, ranking 90 OVER Battle Royal/Amores Perros/ House of Flying Daggers/An Inconvenient Truth.<br />
Surely they jest.</p>
<p>The Royal Tenenbaums at 88?? (and the only W.Andersen)<br />
Memento at 68?! This is a groundbreaking film.<br />
Brick (not ranked)</p>
<p>And then:<br />
BAD SANTA?? at 54??<br />
Knocked Up?? at 49??</p>
<p>I am done with this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 4/16 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: assets.flavorwire.com

Served from: flavorwire.com @ 2012-02-10 05:07:11 -->
