<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flavorwire &#187; NC-17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flavorwire.com/tag/nc-17/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flavorwire.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Festival Favorite &#8216;Shame&#8217; Gets the NC-17, Because of Genitals</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/224190/festival-favorite-shame-gets-the-nc-17-because-of-genitals</link>
		<comments>http://flavorwire.com/224190/festival-favorite-shame-gets-the-nc-17-because-of-genitals#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bailey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carey Mulligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Fassbender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC-17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve McQueen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=224190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame, the sex addiction drama from director Steve McQueen that wowed audiences at the Telluride, Toronto, and New York Film Festivals (where we somehow managed to miss every single screening), has been officially branded with an NC-17 by the MPAA. The application of the rating, which prohibits anyone under the age of 17 from seeing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Shame</em>, the sex addiction drama from director Steve McQueen that wowed audiences at the Telluride, Toronto, and New York Film Festivals (where we somehow managed to miss <em>every single screening</em>), has been <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/10/no-surprise-mpaa-gives-nc-17-to-shame/" target="_blank">officially branded with an NC-17</a> by the MPAA. The application of the rating, which prohibits anyone under the age of 17 from seeing the film (whether with an adult guardian or not), doesn&#8217;t come as much of a surprise to anyone who has seen the picture; star Michael Fassbender reportedly spends a healthy percentage of the film&#8217;s running time in his birthday suit, and without the artful and careful coverage of his man-parts that is required to get the R. (Co-star Carey Mulligan goes full-frontal as well, but <em>that</em>, of course, is perfectly acceptable within the R rating, so hi double standard, how ya doin.)</p>
<p><span id="more-224190"></span></p>
<p>Distributors Fox Searchlight were well aware of the potential ratings hassle when <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/09/toronto-fox-searchlight-to-acquire-shame/" target="_blank">they picked up the film at Toronto</a>; director McQueen (it&#8217;s weird that he didn&#8217;t modify his name, or go by Steven or something, right?) has final cut, and made it clear he wasn’t touching a frame of <em>Shame</em>.</p>
<p>So now the film has the scarlet letter/numbers of NC-17, which was <em>intended</em>, when created in 1990, to designate the kind of &#8220;for adults, but not porn&#8221; movies that its predecessor, the X, originally labeled — pictures like <em>Last Tango in Paris </em>and <em>Midnight Cowboy</em>. But the refusals of theatre chains to carry them, video stores to stock them, and newspapers and television to advertise them resulted in a rating that bore little difference, in terms of revenue or stigma, from the X. Occasionally, a film has come along (<em>Requiem for a Dream</em>, <em>The Dreamers</em>, <em>Bad Education</em>) that looked to challenge the conventional wisdom and ride its positive reviews into some genuine commercial viability for the rating, but those successes have been minor, few, and far between. Time will tell if <em>Shame </em>manages to buck the trend; meanwhile, you can <a href="http://flavorwire.com/222693/trailer-park-sex-screams-and-sequels/7" target="_blank">check out the film&#8217;s trailer</a> in the most recent edition of our weekly &#8220;Trailer Park&#8221; feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flavorwire.com/224190/festival-favorite-shame-gets-the-nc-17-because-of-genitals/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Brief History of NC-17 Movies: A Timeline</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/122472/the-brief-history-of-nc-17-movies-a-timeline</link>
		<comments>http://flavorwire.com/122472/the-brief-history-of-nc-17-movies-a-timeline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Schlinkert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC-17]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=122472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the 20th anniversary of the MPAA’s most restrictive rating: NC-17. The first NC-17 rating was given on October 5, 1990 to Henry &#38; June, a film about the love triangle between Henry and June Miller and Anaïs Nin back in the &#8217;30s — which is rather fitting as Miller&#8217;s 1934 novel Tropic of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the 20th anniversary of the <a href="http://www.mpaa.org/" target="_blank">MPAA</a>’s most restrictive rating: NC-17. The first NC-17 rating was given on October 5, 1990 to <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099762/" target="_blank">Henry &amp; June</a></em>, a film about the love triangle between Henry and June Miller and Anaïs Nin back in the &#8217;30s — which is rather fitting as Miller&#8217;s 1934 novel <em>Tropic of Cancer</em> faced an obscenity trial when it was first published in the early &#8217;60s. Of course content too sexual or violent for an R rating was released on film long before 1990. Click through for a comprehensive timeline of letter ratings — and the films that they kept people out of.</p>
<p><span id="more-122472"></span></p>
<p><strong> 1912</strong> &#8211; The <a href="http://www.bbfc.co.uk/" target="_blank">British Board of Film Classification (BBFC)</a> is founded. They have two certificates: U for universal, meaning suitable for children, and A for adult, meaning children must be accompanied by an adult.</p>
<p><strong>1922</strong> &#8211; The Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America (MPPDA) is founded, with former US Postmaster General Will H. Hays in charge.</p>
<p><strong>1930</strong> &#8211; The MPPDA creates the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hays_code" target="_blank">Motion Picture Production Code</a> (aka the Hays Code), which forbid films from lowering moral standards of viewers or ridiculing law, among other things.</p>
<p><strong>1932</strong> &#8211; The BBFC adds the H certificate (for horror) to the U and A certificates. Only Britons 16 and older could be admitted to a film with an H certificate.</p>
<p><strong>1951 </strong>- The BBFC replaces the H with an X.</p>
<p><a href="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Greetings-1.jpeg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-122542" title="Greetings 1" src="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Greetings-1.jpeg" alt="" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>1968</strong> &#8211; The MPPDA is replaced by <a href="http://www.mpaa.org/" target="_blank">The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)</a> and begins to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_America_film_rating_system" target="_blank">assign ratings</a>, including Britain&#8217;s X rating for films unsuitable for minors. 1968&#8242;s <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063036/" target="_blank">Greetings</a></em>, directed by Brian De Palma and starring Robert De Niro, becomes the first American film to receive an X rating, despite being non-pornographic (it was later re-rated R).</p>
<p><strong>1969 </strong>- <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064665/" target="_blank">Midnight Cowboy</a></em> receives an X rating from the MPAA. It goes on to win Oscars for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay, becoming the first X-rated film to win an Academy Award.</p>
<p><a href="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/clockwork_big.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-122547" title="clockwork_big" src="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/clockwork_big.jpg" alt="" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>1971</strong> &#8211; The MPAA gives Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s<em> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066921/" target="_blank">A Clockwork Orange</a> </em>an X rating.</p>
<p><strong>1972</strong> &#8211; <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068612/" target="_blank">Fritz the Cat</a></em> becomes the first animated film to receive an X rating from the MPAA.</p>
<p><strong>Early 1970s </strong>- The MPAA&#8217;s X rating also referred to non-trademarked films, meaning that any filmmaker could give a film an X rating without even submitting to the MPAA. Thus, beginning in the 1970s, many pornographic films carried an X rating, later evolving into the use of multiple X&#8217;s (i.e. XX, XXX) to indicate just how unsuitable for minors the film was. Again, these were not MPAA-sanctioned ratings — the MPAA only gave single X ratings.</p>
<p><a href="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/henry-and-june-miller-uma-thurman-1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-122554" title="henry-and-june-miller-uma-thurman-1" src="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/henry-and-june-miller-uma-thurman-1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="280" /></a></p>
<p><strong>1990 </strong>- The MPAA replaces the X rating with NC-17, thus separating non-trademarked works from those rated as unsuitable for minors (only the MPAA can give an NC-17 rating). The acronym stands for &#8220;No Children Under 17 Admitted.&#8221; <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099762/" target="_blank">Henry &amp; June</a></em>, released October 5, 1990, becomes the first movie to receive the new rating. Some papers refuse to run ads for the film, or future NC-17 titles.</p>
<p><strong>1995 </strong>- <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114436/" target="_blank">Showgirls</a></em> is released by United Artists with an NC-17 rating. Despite the rating, the film is distributed in 1,388 cinemas upon release, however its financial failure does much to steer producers clear of the NC-17 rating. (That said, with a $20 million box office, it is <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/domestic/mpaa.htm?page=NC-17&amp;p=.htm" target="_blank">the top-grossing NC-17 film</a> all of time. Food for thought.) Many films, upon receiving an NC-17 rating, have gone back and edited out contentious material until the MPAA downgrades the rating to R. Both <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0163651/" target="_blank">American Pie</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462322/" target="_blank">Grindhouse</a></em> were originally rated NC-17 and later edited down to R.</p>
<p><strong>Late 1990s</strong> &#8211; The MPAA changes the wording of the NC-17 rating from &#8220;No Children Under 17 Admitted&#8221; to &#8220;No One 17 And Under Admitted.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/zackandmiri-916-13.jpg"><img src="http://assets.flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/zackandmiri-916-13.jpg" alt="" title="ZACH AND MIRI MAKE A PORNO" width="500" height="332" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-122578" /></a></p>
<p><strong>2008- </strong>Kevin Smith&#8217;s <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1007028/" target="_blank">Zack and Miri Make a Porno</a></em> becomes the first film to win an R rating after appealing the MPAA&#8217;s NC-17 designation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flavorwire.com/122472/the-brief-history-of-nc-17-movies-a-timeline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Sacha Baron Cohen&#8217;s Bruno NC-17 Worthy?</title>
		<link>http://flavorwire.com/15898/is-sacha-baron-cohens-bruno-nc-17-worthy</link>
		<comments>http://flavorwire.com/15898/is-sacha-baron-cohens-bruno-nc-17-worthy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Stanley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC-17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacha Baron Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slumdog Millionaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flavorwire.com/?p=15898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it is for now, according to The Wrap&#8217;s Sharon Waxman, but there&#8217;s still plenty of time for Universal to tone things down in time for the July release. Per her post: &#8220;Among the objectionable scenes is one in which Bruno — a gay Austrian fashionista played by Baron Cohen — appears to have anal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is for now, according to <a href="http://www.thewrap.com/article/2127">The Wrap&#8217;s Sharon Waxman</a>, but there&#8217;s still plenty of time for Universal to tone things down in time for the July release. Per her post: &#8220;Among the objectionable scenes is one in which Bruno — a gay Austrian fashionista played by Baron Cohen — appears to have anal sex with a man on camera. In another, the actor goes on a hunting trip and sneaks naked into the tent of one of the fellow hunters, an unsuspecting non-actor.&#8221;<span id="more-15898"></span></p>
<p>Awesome. We actually think this is <a href="http://flavorwire.com/14011/sacha-baron-cohen-might-be-able-to-top-borat-morning-links">yet another good sign</a> about the quality of the flick, as some of our favorite comedies were deemed NC-17 before they were edited down for a R-rating.</p>
<p>Like what? Why we&#8217;re glad you asked! <em>The 40-Year-Old Virgin</em> (&#8220;pervasive sexual content, language and some drug use&#8221;), <em>American Pie</em> (&#8220;strong sexuality, crude sexual dialogue, language and drinking, all involving teens&#8221;), <em>Clerks</em> (&#8220;extensive use of extremely explicit sex-related dialogue&#8221;), <em>Pink Flamingos</em> (&#8220;a wide range of perversions in explicit detail&#8221;), <em>Showgirls</em> (&#8220;nudity and erotic sexuality throughout, and for some graphic language and sexual violence&#8221;), and <a href="http://flavorwire.com/1483/kevin-smith-would-rather-be-the-artist-formerly-known-as-prince">the universally underloved</a> <em>Zack and Miri Make a Porno</em> (&#8220;strong crude sexual content including dialogue, graphic nudity and pervasive language&#8221;).</p>
<p>Also, while it&#8217;s not a comedy, remember <a href="http://flavorwire.com/317/danny-boyles-latest-gets-slammed-with-r-rating-critics-cry-foul-play">the rating drama</a> we told you about with <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>? And just look how well that all turned out for Danny Boyle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flavorwire.com/15898/is-sacha-baron-cohens-bruno-nc-17-worthy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 13/20 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: assets.flavorwire.com

Served from: flavorwire.com @ 2012-02-09 19:11:27 -->
