Jeff Koons: Born Through Porn (NSFW)

Controversial when first exhibited at the Venice Biennale in 1990, Jeff KoonsMade in Heaven series is still shocking viewers today. Consisting of large photos printed on canvas, Murano glassworks, and marble sculptures, the series flaunts Koons and his wife at that time, celebrated Italian porn star and politician Ilona Staller (aka La Cicciolina), as a modern-day Adam and Eve, caught in staged moments of carnal foreplay and lustful lovemaking. Referencing a variety of art history sources — from the realist paintings of Courbet and Manet to the fanciful canvases of Fragonard and Boucher — the work pushed the act of portraying sexual relations in art to a new height, or new low, depending on your point of view.

Marking the 20th anniversary of the work’s release, the New York gallery Luxembourg & Dayan has gathered together nine of the unique paintings and a glass sculpture for an exhibition in its stylish Upper East Side townhouse. The show starts out fairly tame with Hand on Breast and Fingers Between Legs on the second floor, but ends on a bolder note with Dirty Ejaculation and Exaltation on the gallery’s upper level.

In her essay for the accompanying catalogue, Guggenheim Museum adjunct curator Alison Gingeras suggests, “In the process of making Made in Heaven from 1989 to 1992, Jeff Koons became Jeff Koons,” while summarizing, “The markers of his current successes — the auction records, his decoration of Frances Legion d’honneur, the glowing magazine profiles — are all legitimized by the sincerity he proved with Made in Heaven. Jeff Koons as we know him today was born through porn.”

Jeff Koons: Made in Heaven Paintings is on view at Luxembourg & Dayan October 6, 2010 through January 21, 2011.

Click through below for a gallery of some of the tamer images in the show.


Jeff Koons, Hand on Breast, 1990, Oil inks silkscreened on canvas, 95.8 x 144.1 inches, Courtesy Luxembourg & Dayan, New York

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

[...] to contemporary times at its New York outpost. None of the works on view, including major pieces by Jeff Koons, Damian Hirst, Takashi Murakami, and Andres Serrano will be auctioned, but many of them are [...]

When you do avant-garde art, many people won't like it. Remember what happened with "Fountain" in 1917? ...if it looks like art, its probably not very good.

Art is everything included in life as the above, sex or porn and however you want to call it.

Art should not be about morality? Nan, voyons? Art is about everything, no boundaries, a reflection about the abstraction of the unlimited

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to see these wonderful paintings, which I consider of Greek and Roman art beautiful in spite of some people consider it pornographic. Thank you for your effort and wonderful ... .. you my love and greetings ...

I agree with Nan it is art about our times and art should not be about morality but used as an avenue to check the values that are important to a culture. I believe this work was done in the 1990's and Koons was reflecting to me that the power of sexuality has not changed that much. For me there is also a sadness in the decadence and beauty since it only scratches the surface and makes me wonder if their relationship is more about using the other instead of loving each other. When viewing your mind can go to a dark place while your sexuality soars.

I am not taking my kid to see this show, but I will go see it. Art is a reflection of a society, and this is one aspect of this society, or you are going to tell me we live in Norman Rockwell times. Even Rockwell times were not Rockewell times. It is work worth appreciating as art; it is a great mirror of our times. It speaks of capitalism, the desire to be famous no matter what. It's art after the sexual revolution, it's decadent and beautiful. Another great show is Michael St John at Andrea Rosen. By the way, art should not be about morality.

my provider is blocking it ? cannot open it from this side either, however the titles say something and i have seen 2 of them it is 'stunt' art, nothing more ...

so prudish. you know it is arthouse get over yourselves.

NOT WORTH SEEING ACTUALLY, NOT REAL PORN, JUST OVERACTED PICTURES OF THE COUPLE, KIND OF DISGUSTING, AND IS NOT THAT I WAS SPECTING THE REAL THING IS JUST THAT DOESN'T GET TO THE POINT OF TAKING SUGGESTIVE SEX AND PORN TO THE LEVEL OF ART.

Wow - his smirk is so terrible, yes we see how bad it is you are fooling no one but young kids. We pretty much all have the same parts, no surprises or insights there. The only "artful" thing about it is how he managed to make the human body look less than beautiful.

i can't see it either, but i remember(thanx, john lennon and jimi hendrix). i'm on a public library computer terminal in the state of Washington, in the United States.

Error message on my computer, can't see anything. Censorship on the web already?

Not art, by a considerable stretch, but pretty good as sheer provocation. And the grandiloquence of the execution, impeccable as always, qualifies it as potent poshlust, ahem.

Absolutely, positively some of the wort cr*p in the entire history of art.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] to contemporary times at its New York outpost. None of the works on view, including major pieces by Jeff Koons, Damian Hirst, Takashi Murakami, and Andres Serrano will be auctioned, but many of them are [...]