10 Authors and the Directors Who Were Born to Adapt Them

We usually cringe when we hear about film adaptations of great, difficult literary authors’ books. But we were actually intrigued to learn that There Will Be Blood director Paul Thomas Anderson is thinking about bringing Thomas Pynchon’s latest novel, Inherent Vice, to the big screen. Somehow, Anderson and Pynchon just seem right together. Hell, this just might work! And that got us thinking about other directors who seem born to adapt the work of certain writers. See who we paired up after the jump, and suggest your own matches in the comments.

Oscar Wilde and Todd Haynes

Wilde has actually already appeared in one of Haynes’ films: He was the sort of patron saint of the thinly veiled Bowie biopic Velvet Goldmine, showing up as a child in the beginning and then returning in the form of an heirloom brooch and some appropriated witticisms later on. And in his first feature, Poison, the filmmaker drew on another hero of gay lit, Jean Genet. Throughout his career, Haynes has shown an appreciation for glamorous, mysterious, and controversial characters, as well as lush art direction and strong dialog – all of which would be necessary to pull off Wilde.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

"Both (Roth & Allen) men are 70-something, Jewish Manhattanites." Or, Newark & Brooklyn. But whatevs. Fun list, but that's just lazy. Even if Allen has focused much (but not all) of his work on Manhattanites. Roth has remained resolutely a son of Newark.

@Chase: You're being redundant. Lists are lazy, period.

Also, del Toro is WAAAAAY too dark to adapt Garcia Marquez. While the books are generally dark in subject matter (murders, revolution, social inequity), they are touched with a light, fantastical hand and gentle humor. Far more appropriate would be Michel Gondry, who tends to blend humor, pathos and fantasy realism in a more seamless way.

If we're going for obvious connections, then what's with pairing Tim Burton with Charles Dickens? How about Tim Burton and Neil Gaiman being practically twins separated at birth? Hell, they even pick equally eccentric partners (Burton's Helena Bonham Carter, Gaiman's Amanda F'ing Palmer). The emo world weeps for this gross omission...

weak. wes anderson/DFW is absurd and reflects lack of familiarity with DFW

Way to just stick the most famous living Spanish-speaking director with the most famous living Spanish-speaking novelist. Anyway, I'd rather see Almodovar do "Love in the Time of Cholera" or Alexander Sukorov do "Chronicle of a Death Foretold."

Oh, it's not a bad list at all, though I agree with Chase that is at times a bit obvious. I do have one major disagreement though - I don't see Wes Anderson doing DFW. I often admire his jewelry-box aesthetic, but it's far too precious - or maybe I mean precious in a different way - from DFW's shaggy-dog, linguistically acrobatic free-for-all. Sadly, I have no one else to suggest. John Krasinski did Brief Interviews With Hideous Men, and the result was more respectful than successful. Though he did manage to make the language come alive, occasionally. DFW was a big movie buff - probably someone asked him at some point.

(follow up) Though I'm pretty sure there was a stipulation in his will that dictated nobody ever could, legally, make a film adaptation of his work.

Chase is a hater. I'm into this list. I would die if Baumbach made an adaptation of Salinger's work. I think that an adaptation of Nine Stories as nine short films would be pretty amazing, and that Adrien Brody would make a really good Seymour Glass.

Lazy list. Just went for the obvious connections.

royal tenenbaums = infinite jest, kind of.