Dirty Old (Literary) Men: The Top 10 of Writing’s Filthiest Pervert Geniuses

There has been a lot of talk about books and sex in this space lately, and it’s not just because of yesterday’s holiday. Anyone who has taken English 101 knows that literature has its share of dirty old men — the lascivious, the leering, and the lewd, the men who concern themselves with the baser instincts and darker drives, the author equivalent of the creep in the corner, stroking his chin and staring at the rears of the teenagers. Herein, some of the dirtiest, most salacious and scandalous men in letters, a list of the Top 10 Dirty Old Literary Men.

1. Charles Bukowski

Bukowski, that bawdy sod, boozed, brawled, and screwed his way in and out of literary infamy. A chronicler of low-lifedom, his concerns were carnal, sometimes exuberant, often defeated and depressed. “You boys can keep your virgins,” he wrote. “Give me hot old women in high heels with asses that forgot to get old.”

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Burroughs 5 pts

Where is William S Burroughs on this list...  For shame

 

[...] top ten dirty literary men1 Comment David Blackburn - 16 February 2011 17:23 American website Flavorwire has compiled a jolly list for a Wednesday afternoon: the top ten dirtiest male writers. It’s [...]

[...] they can get a little scandalous. After all, we know that great authors can tend to be a little dirtier than your average swooner, and what better place to let their freak flag fly than in private [...]

[...] has a reputation for trying to seduce his lady interviewers, but that’s never stopped us from liking an author. More importantly, he sticks to his idealistic guns, even when under heavy attack. In 2002, he was [...]

[...] got another doozy of a post up about perverted geniuses in literature. Okay, maybe I did know Bukowski was a womanizing drunk, but [...]

[...] The Top 10 Dirty Old (Literary) Men [...]

what if you just read a snippet of "Tales from a dirty old man"?

Bukowski's main topic is "carnal"? Please. If you'd have read more than just a snippet of one of his short stories, maybe you would understand that there is significantly more depth to the writer than just sex and vulgarities.

And the top 10 women?

The Marquis de Sade should unquestionably be on this list. The man has an entire fetish named after him. His name became a sex word, people!

I will echo previous comments and point out that you missed all of the gay writers. How can you not include William S. Burroughs in this list? Once again I run into an article of Nina MacLaughlin that is so limited it would seem that she has either read a very select group of authors or she has copied her list from someone else. My advice to Nina, gain a broader knowledge of literature before you attempt to create another list of anything.

I thought this was going to be all contemporary writers for some reason - anyway,what about William T. Vollmann for The Royal Family and Dennis Cooper?Also Genet and Burroughs, as people have said.

Whither the writer of "Memories of my Melancholy Whores?" :)

What! No Nicholson Baker? Fermata. It's funny, too.

Wow. Serious dribble. Not that I scrolled through all pages. Put away your thesaurus and try to write some honest smut. It's harder than you think.

the thing with Nabokov is it's easy to assume LOLITA was a horn dog diddler book. but you can argue it was not. you can argue nabokov is not promoting diddling but rather condemning it. of course told from HH's POV it appears to exonerate him from any accountability for his actions but if tyou read the book carefully, and maybe more than once, you might sense that VN was actually knowingly portraying HH as a character who attempts to argue the blame for his actions be placed on the young "coquette" when the text does not neecessarily support that conclusion.

uhhhh, no. women should not be on this list (of literary MEN). It is a list of literary MEN. Did you catch that? Get over yourselves.

I'm with Paul. Add Erica Jong to his list.

No William S. Burroughs. Huh.

What about the women? Anaïs Nin wrote subtle literary porn to order for a wealthy patron and got Miller in on the gig. And Catherine M's "La Vie Sexuelle" which makes Houellebecq look like a choirboy?

Oh, the Puritanism hereabouts, all from the JudaeoChristians and Islamites --- let them all get to a nunnery with their grotesquely perverse sexual repressiveness. What is most perverse and disgusting about these writers is the attitudes the sexual repressionistas take towards them, folk who have not fully considered their Chaucer or Shakespeare, and who certainly have not read Henry Miller, Anais Ninn, or D. H. Lawrence in any serious fashion. Nor have they read very much about sexual behavior the world round, or historically. Sexuality has always been part and parcel of human existence, until the Christians arrived, took over western civilizations, made sexuality sinful, and established the putative validity of the guilt trip for sexual behavior. You might begin with the idea that sexual behavior is wrong only when you force it on somebody or deceive someone in pursuit of it, or when you get someone, including yourself, pregnant or pass along or pick up an STD. Even within those limits, one could discover that varying degrees of real guilt exist in the above categories. But as to guilt over sex itself, that should have been thrown away long ago, along with the other forms of chastity belts. What's dirty about sex, East or West, is the suppression and repression of it, and the use of force or violence associated with it, force or violence that is usually the result of sexual repression – a vast and hateful circularity of psychological elements that wreak havoc in human beings. Let us go back to the ancient ways, the preChristian attitudes, and celebrate sexuality as a gift from the gods, one of the few in fact. Think Bonobo, Pan paniscus. Make love, and be happy. jim crawford Westwood NJ

I can't read Updike because he is such a misogynist, comparing the sight of female genitals to "raw hamburger."

Where's the print/single page button/link? I'll come back and read it then. bye.

wtf does h.s.t. have to do w/ anything?

Pretty hetronormative. Where the gays at?

Hah, I can't believe I re-typed the "light of [his] loins" without catching the mistake, as the astute Nomi01 did. "Light of my loins" doesn't even make sense.

Nabokov doesn't open his novel by referring to a twelve-year-old as the light of HIS loins. That voice is Humbert Humbert's. A reader who conflates an author with his or her character(s) is an immature and unsophisticated one indeed.

No Oscar Wilde? I'm detecting a heterosexual bias! And Updike's tendencies are definitely more misogynistic than lustful. Can't believe that Lord Byron didn't make the list. And Joyce definitely does not belong here--a man can make any comment he likes about his wife's ass!!

Francois Rabelais? The daddy of them all (especially Joyce).

Sir Richard Francis Burton? (the explorer)- 1001 Arabian Nights, Kama Sutra, and others equally delicious.

No Zola? Literary philistines.

How could you forget the Marquis de Sade, The 120 Days of Sodom, among other literary ejaculations.

What a stupid, sniggering, puritanical article.

Excuse me, why is this list missing the most obvious perverse geniuses, the lovely Frenchmen, Georges Bataille and Marquis de Sade? They wrote the most wonderfully disgusting philosophical-pornographic literature of all time! Not to mention, Jean Genet and Charles Baudelaire, the list is obviously Anglo-centric.

No Walt Whitman? "Trickle Drops", "Song of Myself", "Calamus", "We Two Boys Together Clinging"! He was banned in some circles because of his blatant homoeroticsm

Just curious, y'know? Not to be uptight (as suggested above) -- but the article speaks for itself in assuming we know who is the famous dude in the pics, and leaves off the identities of all the others in the photos...

bit uptight w/ responses, eh? It's almost like a slide-show, it's entertainment, who cares how many pages it runs over? Unless you have competing website, a similar theme & your having a traffic contest? And the quote there, at the end of the Nabokov entry that you're so upset about? It's not a quote. There's no quote at all in fact for you to be superior about. It just mentions what the beginning of the novel is about: Loins. Hope your weeks get better guys.

yeah, but Bellow taught Roth everything he knows

Aw really? Nabokov? You clearly have never read a single word he's said in interviews. The reason his book seems as though it was written by an actual pedophile is that he's a damn good writer. Also, you got that quote wrong. Light of my life, fire of my loins. Sigh.

Hum, it should be spelled Houellebecq.

and what about e.e. cummings? the name says it all

I know it's a made-up name and it serves the pretentious old coot right, but I remain compelled to point out that it's really Houellebecq, and not Houellelbecq.

It's easy to go "LOLita," but Nabokov's "Ada, or Ardor" is full of kids diddling each other in amazing detail. Pick it up sometime!

I'd disagree with the idea of Updike being anything close to a misogynist. What he did was chronicle the ambivalence of men of his generation, raised arms-distance from women, then baffled by the sudden change of morés in the 60s and 70s. But his female characters are far too rich and complicated to suggest he disliked women, and in fact, it's usually his male characters who come off as clumsier and less sophisticated than the females.

Really? Paginated over 10 damned pages. What a shitty attempt to boost your traffic numbers.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] The Top 10 Dirty Old (Literary) Men [...]

  2. [...] got another doozy of a post up about perverted geniuses in literature. Okay, maybe I did know Bukowski was a womanizing drunk, but [...]

  3. [...] has a reputation for trying to seduce his lady interviewers, but that’s never stopped us from liking an author. More importantly, he sticks to his idealistic guns, even when under heavy attack. In 2002, he was [...]

  4. [...] they can get a little scandalous. After all, we know that great authors can tend to be a little dirtier than your average swooner, and what better place to let their freak flag fly than in private [...]

  5. [...] top ten dirty literary men1 Comment David Blackburn – 16 February 2011 17:23 American website Flavorwire has compiled a jolly list for a Wednesday afternoon: the top ten dirtiest male writers. It’s [...]