In Defense of Last Night's Harrowing 'Treme' Episode

Last night’s episode of HBO’s Treme was difficult to watch. For a show that is often criticized for moving too slowly (this, despite the jarring suicide of a main character towards the end of its first season), it packed quite a bit of action — of the heartbreaking, tearjerking variety. Today, Salon’s Matt Zoller Seitz is denouncing the episode’s most shocking story line as a “cheap, ugly showstopper.” As someone who found the same harrowing twist to be as effective as it was devastating, I respectfully disagree.

Warning: If you don’t want Sunday’s most recent Treme episode spoiled for you, stop reading now.

For much of Treme Season 1, we saw the people of New Orleans coming together to salvage their lives and bury their dead. There were casualties, like John Goodman’s increasingly frustrated and irate Creighton Bernette, but there were also small victories: Big Chief managed to reassemble his tribe for what may be their final parade; Annie broke free of her heroin-addicted boyfriend, Sonny, and launched a more successful musical career; DJ Davis found purpose in recording an anti-government anthem; and Toni helped LaDonna find out what really happened to her brother.

Several months later, in Season 2, things are different. The initial spirit of unity has broken down, partially due to the egregious failure of local and federal relief efforts. Crime is through the roof, and wealthy opportunists, including Treme‘s new, amoral “rainmaker” Nelson Hidalgo, jockey for government contracts. While some, like chef Janette, have been forced to find work outside New Orleans, those who refuse to leave are slowly breaking down; even Big Chief has become an dead-eyed shadow of his former self.  

Throughout all of this, one character has remained strong and spirited: Khandi Alexander’s LaDonna Batiste-Williams. Now that she has put her brother’s body to rest, she could easily retreat to Baton Rouge, where her dentist husband and family live comfortably. But, as this season’s first few episodes remind us, she is happiest in her New Orleans bar, bantering with regulars. Amid all the devastation, this dive is LaDonna’s haven — until this week.

As she’s closing down for the night, a young guy bangs on the bar’s gate. He wants her to give him directions somewhere, and he wants to come in and use her phone. LaDonna is too smart to fall for this. She tells him that maybe the NOPD can help him out, and he disappears as she calls 911 to report the suspicious character. Of course, the operator advises her to call back on a non-emergency line.

Law enforcement still hasn’t arrived when LaDonna tries to leave a few minutes later. The guy returns as she steps outside and locks the door, and he’s got a friend with him. She retreats back into the bar, but they kick down the door. When they won’t stop at taking the money she throws at them, LaDonna grabs a bat and starts swinging. A few scenes later, a good Samaritan carries her into the hospital, her face bloody and bruised. David Simon spares us from having to watch the assault, out of what feels like respect for both the audience and LaDonna. We find out slowly that not only has she been beaten and had her bar stripped of anything potentially valuable, but she’s also been raped.

Matt Zoller Seitz has a few problems with how this plays out: He observes that the men who rape LaDonna and plunder her bar are portrayed as “almost literally faceless” — a move that’s out of chracter for Simon, who so rarely resorts to simple, “good guys vs. bad guys” oppositions. Although I agree that Treme, and The Wire before it, tends to succeed because it doesn’t operate this way, there’s a solid reason for what we see here: We only see these criminals through LaDonna’s eyes. I assume this case won’t end here, and that’s when we’ll get a bit more complexity. Even if we don’t, let’s remember that LaDonna’s attackers are rapists, not guys stealing bread to feed their starving families. Is there really a lot of space for moral ambiguity there?

Seitz’s main complaint, though, is that we see too little of LaDonna in an episode where other subplots should have receded to accommodate the enormity of her trauma. “I wanted to see more of her valiant struggle against her attackers,” he writes. But that we didn’t drives home what’s so depressing here — that even this tough, vibrant woman was powerless to stop what happened to her. In the real world, which Simon is always trying to depict, resourcefulness and a good attitude can’t always save you.

We don’t see enough of the aftermath either, says Seitz, who believes “the hospital and recovery scenes were meager and perfunctory.” I disagree. Khandi Alexander is one of TV’s most powerful actresses, and we didn’t need to see more than her mangled face to feel the attack’s impact. LaDonna is so injured, inside and out, that she barely speaks. Almost immediately, she’s confronted with a rape kit and someone looking to question her about the assailants. We understand her unearned shame when she refuses to talk about her sexual assault in front of her husband. In one long scene, LaDonna takes pill after pill to prevent STDs (tellingly, we don’t see whether she takes the Plan B she’s offered), and we’re forced to process the potential fallout of rape. Especially compared with what we see on other TV dramas, this hardly seems like a disrespectful portrayal of the character’s recovery.

As for whether the incident and its aftermath deserved more screen time, Seitz raises an interesting question. He argues that Simon’s refusal to break his patchwork style, giving all story lines equal weight, cheapens LaDonna’s suffering. For me, it felt more like a reminder that, in the grand scheme of post-Katrina life in New Orleans, her rape is just one more item on a police blotter already hopelessly overcrowded with murders and robberies. If anything, this only adds resonance to LaDonna’s plight. Switching back over to her after lighter (if never exactly fluffy) scenes reminds us of how quickly individual tragedies can get lost in the shuffle. But after the credits roll, it’s Alexander’s expressive face — those sharp eyes, that pulpy, quivering mouth — that stays with us. By sticking to his structure, Simon ensures that we comprehend LaDonna’s tragedy on both a personal and a systemic level.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

[...] posted on Flavorwire. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← CultureGrrl on the [...]

I wholeheartedly agree with your rebuttal. LaDonna's face was a perfect reflection of what happened. The orchestrated way the meds were dispersed and the ushering out of the husband so the rape kit could be administered were also sobering. Did I need to see each swing, miss, and then punch from her assailants? Not really. The way the rape was handled is just another reason why I like the show so much.

I don't agree with Salon's critique entirely. I certainly didn't need to have better lighting on the assailants or see a protracted attempt to fight off her attackers... But I think the point about plot structure and pacing is spot on. Once the attack had taken place- it effectively dwarfs all the other plotlines- particularly "Sonny the No-Talent Prick Schlepps For A Gig". After a trauma like that is visited on perhaps the series most heroic character, it's simply crummy storytelling to give equal screentime to "gotta get a Facebook account to promote my music!" or "please let me borrow your Telecaster, Mr. Bubbles NA Sponsor..." If I'm getting caught up with a group of friends, and hearing their trivial (but endearing) stories about having to sell out and get a Minivan, or about wishing they hadn't installed the latest iPhone upgrade because they're having sync problems, and one of my friends mentions that she was just raped last week, im not going to say, "Hold up, hon- we'll get back to your rape story in a few minutes-, let Karen finish her story about the Minivan salesman..." As dumb as that example is, it still points our what was off about the episode. It isn't bravery or brilliance to relegate the Big Awful Tragedy to C plot priority- to push it to the background. Like it or not, that plot twist became the Big Event of the season thusfar. It should not, then, have been competing with throwaway plots of lesser characters.

I think our society trivializes rape by the ease with which people call every perceived disagreeable circumstance rape, using the metaphor endlessly. (Bad grade=prof raped you; lost an election or a ball game=opponent raped you; had to pay bank fees=bank raped you.) This results, not in any kind of solidarity with people who are actually raped or in a resolve to prosecute rapists and stamp out rape but rather, leads to people feeling comfortable about shrugging and turning away. "After all, everybody gets raped one way or the other," they seem to say, as if they are taking the facile, 'edgy' metaphors literally. I don't believe Simon is offering us rape as a trope. If I thought so, I would, with TFYFWYA, never watch another episode. As shocking and painful as this development is, I am applauding Simon's handing of it. He made sure we would care about this crime. The women and the choreographed scenes at the hospital were superb. I am old enough to remember when such emergencies were handled very, very differently.

@TFYFWYA Believe me, no one would be happier than me to see rape disappear from popular culture -- but refusing to depict something that's a horrible reality for so many means pretending we live in a better world than we do. Pretending rape doesn't exist is what's unforgivable.

I no longer watch TV shows with rape storylines, so sadly, this is the last of Treme for me. I agree wholeheartedly with the Salon article and disagree completely with this one. Rape is such a tired trope and to use it here against this strong lady was unforgivable on the part of the writers.

Exactly right - excellent rebuttal to M. Z-S.

I thought this was an outstanding episode albeit it difficult to watch. I think the first season really laid the groundwork for what we are seeing now. This is one of the few shows I make sure to tune in.

Good Point. I don't want to dehumanize her either so I'm sorry if I did do so. However, watching David Simon & co.'s stuff over the past few years has taught me to that the macro and the micro are always colliding on screen. Also, I think the writing staff may be setting it up so that her long term (rest of the season and seasons to come) reaction to what happened will parallel the reaction of everyday people/residents of NO reacting to what is happening to their city. Will see. I could very wrong.

@Alexander Kern Definitely agree. I like the idea that we're seeing the aftermath partially through her husband's eyes. Getting to know him this season has been a good thing for continuing to learn about LaDonna and complicating her relationship with Antoine. @Spirit of 76 That's an interesting point. I'll have to watch how LaDonna's rape plays out in subsequent episodes to know whether I agree, and I don't want to dehumanize the character by making her a mere metaphor, but the incident is an extreme example of kicking New Orleans residents while they're down.

Excellent Rebuttal to the guy at Salon.com. Also, I am thinking that that the rape of LaDonna is metaphor representing of what is happening in NO 14 months after the storm. The carpetbaggers getting a piece of the recovery pie (building, trash removal, govt. contracts) in contrast to the majority of the experiences of the locals who get little or nothing...ie the raping of the city...Maybe a stretch, maybe not.

Judy-I think you nailed it. In a way, I feel like when the subject of rape is approached in visual media, sometimes the filmmakers think the only way to illustrate that kind of horror is by playing the scene out in the most vivid detail in order to make the viewer share in the degradation of this human being. While sometimes this works in service of the piece, there are times where it feels quite cheap and exploitative. In this instance, however, seeing such a marked shift in her personality without seeing the abhorrent act makes the viewer feel all of her frustration that much more, as we were not there to witness it. I find that the power of a show like Treme lies largely in how the audience identifies with the feelings and motivations of its characters. By not allowing the audience to participate as spectators during the attack, we are made to feel the same sense of unease and fear as her husband, whose lack of information about her situation made him rightfully fear the worst. In terms of the depiction of LaDonna's rape and its subsequent aftermath, I think Simon and company did everything right.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] posted on Flavorwire. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← CultureGrrl on the [...]