10 Summer Popcorn Movies That Don't Suck

Although we’re pretty sure it’s playing on every single screen in the country and its Fourth-of-July weekend release is timed to make its ingestion some sort of a patriotic duty, we here at Flavorwire would like to officially discourage you from seeing Transformers: Dark of the Moon, because it is soulless and empty and loud and stupid and basically the personification of all that is derivative and evil in contemporary Hollywood (it is the second sequel to a film based on an ‘80s cartoon based on a toy line — in 3-D!).

And no, we haven’t seen it. You don’t have to have had chlamydia to know it’s not enjoyable. The scorching reviews are warning enough for us: “More leering shots of hot cars and hot women, the absurd gravitas of a military propaganda film, the ‘comic relief’ robots with foreign accents, and an editing style that’s either legitimately avant-garde or timed to the wing-flaps of a deranged hummingbird.” (Scott Tobias); “I miraculously survived a preview screening with a throbbing headache and slight nausea; others may not be so lucky.” (Lou Lumenick); “This is an empty husk of a cinematic entertainment, one that’s knee-deep in shiny computer effects but entirely bereft of anything resembling wit or creativity or craftsmanship. It’s the world’s largest drum kit falling down an eternal flight of stairs.” (Scott Weinberg); “It provided me with one of the more unpleasant experiences I’ve had at the movies.” (Roger Ebert); and so on.

But the thing is, we’re not art movie snobs around here. We like big, brash summer blockbusters, and Hollywood does them better than anyone; we have the resources to make them well, which is why it’s so depressing that the summer movie season has become a glut of Fast Fives and Pirates 4s and Transformers 3s. The problem is the fundamental misunderstanding that making a film for the widest audience does not have to mean making a film for the lowest common denominator. It is possible to make a big-budget summer movie that blows stuff up real good without insulting the intelligence of the moviegoing public. Don’t believe us? Do yourself a favor this weekend: save the inflated Transformers ticket price, and return to one of the truly great popcorn movies we’ve listed below.

Jaws

It all started here. Steven Spielberg’s 1975 adaptation of Peter Benchley’s bestseller is widely regarded as the first “summer blockbuster,” primarily because Universal adopted a wide-release strategy that was, at the time, quite unusual; until then, big movies used a “platform release” strategy — similar to the one that’s still used for most independent and art-house flicks — whereby a film would premiere on a few screens in a couple of big markets, then slowly expand to more and more cities as word of mouth grew. But audience reaction was so strong at Universal’s previews, and public anticipation was so high due to the book’s success, that when the film opened on June 20, 1975, it did so on an unprecedented 464 screens, expanding a month later to 675. It was also — astonishingly — the first major release to use national television spots as part of its advertising strategy (according to Peter Biskind’s indispensable Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, “television was still regarded as a rival medium, not an adjunct to movie promotion”), which paid off handsomely. The movie grossed an unprecedented $7 million in its first weekend in theaters, and the wide-release, media-saturation strategy of summer movies forevermore was born. For that, it’s easy to get pissed off at Jaws, but the trouble is, for whatever it wrought, it is an indisputably great adventure yarn, filled with distinctive characters and rich humor. It is also a study in contrast to current trends; both in an attempt to craft Hitchcockian suspense and because of the mechanical difficulties of the practical prop, the shark itself was seen only occasionally, and the first glimpse was held until nearly halfway in. If anybody tried to make Jaws today, the antagonist would surely be one of those terrible CGI Deep Blue Sea sharks, and we’d see him by the five-minute mark.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

[...] 10 Summer Popcorn Movies That Don't Suck [...]

[...] it was just the other day that we were singing the popcorn praises of the original Mission: Impossible film, but its sequels [...]

Speaking of Christopher Nolan, you could probably make a case for Inception, since it did come out in the summer, and it has quite the action sequences, but a hell of a lot artsier than the other movies listed.

Matt nailed another good "departure from the original" film. Totally agree. And Jason, don't sweat it. Arnold's still giving you the thumb's up at the end. While I'm thinking about the Terminator franchise and rekindling my love of Michael Biehn, another good change of direction: 1986's Aliens went from Ridley Scott's spine-tingling creepiness to the coolest sounding machine guns I've ever heard (as well as the second installment in Bill Paxton's campaign to be the only actor killed by a Terminator, an Alien, and a Predator [Lance Henriksen comes close, but it's the crash that kills him, right?]). Wow, I'm a nerd.

Bravo. And I couldn't agree more about Independence Day – I am all for high camp, but that movie was so fucking insultingly jingoistic and idiotic that it made me vow never to see another explosions-and-flag-waving blockbuster as long as I lived

Shoulda had that one, Matt-- and per Austen's mention, I can't EFFING BELIEVE I missed T2.

Love this, except the jab at Independence Day! That flick is a brilliant piece of patriotic camp! Also as such INSANELY quotable.

Let's add the best of the Harry Potter film franchise: "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban," which moved away from the LOOK IT'S MAGIC HARRY! MAGIC! tone of the first two movies, blasted out the color, proved itself willing to move into darker directions and press its actors harder, while still having fun and maintaining a playfulness that makes you almost want to don robes. Also, Alfonso Cuaron's demanding, spiraling direction is more than hardly any summer movie deserves.

This was a fun read, especially reliving my middle-school euphoria of watching Jurassic Park as a 13-year-old. Love your (spot on) take on Lethal Weapon 2. While Empire, T2, and TDK seem to garner the most acclaim as the best sequels (if I'm off-base here, let me know), the second Lethal Weapon has to be the sharpest left turn from the original that turned out to be successful. Who knew psycho Mel Gibson turned wacky Mel Gibson works? Oh wait, everyone? Just a few additional notes: Paul Rudd summed up the Bourne movies perfectly with his Matt Damon review in The 40-Year-Old Virgin. And if Transformers is really pissing you off that much, check out Dan Kois' Razzie-watch over at Grantland. http://www.grantland.com/blog/hollywood-prospectus/post/_/id/593/razziewatch-dark-of-the-razzberry I promise; it'll make you smile.

@Randy- Of course it's not an insult-- I merely meant that since it was roundly praised and an all-time box office champ, there wasn't much need to go into those specifics. I frankly prefer TDK to Begins as well, but have written about it on numerous previous occasions here and didn't want to repeat myself.

are you insulting the dark knight in the last line, or praising it? Personally, I thought Batman Begins was a little heavy on the dark side of Bruce Wayne, and The Dark Knight was the sequel to end all sequels. Thematic, metaphoric, faithful to the source material, and an improvement in every way upon Batman Begins (Maggie Gylenhall >>>>>>> Katie Holmes). Batman Begins is a great reboot, but doesn't hold a candle to The Dark Knight.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] it was just the other day that we were singing the popcorn praises of the original Mission: Impossible film, but its sequels [...]