10 Advertisements That Shamelessly Rip Off Well-Known Songs

When the advertisement for Dell’s new laptop started airing last week, it came accompanied by a song that was kind of like Broken Bells, only shittier. Unfortunately, this is far from the first time a band has had its music “borrowed” for a commercial — the sound-alike has a long and ignominious history, and since suing for music-related copyright infringement is notoriously difficult, it’s unlikely to stop any time soon. After the jump, we’ve collated some of the more notorious examples from years gone by. Read on and shake your head in disbelief. (We also can’t help but be amused that several of the most shameless examples have been quickly dragged off YouTube by the companies involved on the basis of, yes, copyright infringement. Ha.)

Broken Bells vs. Dell

Right, so let’s start with the most recent case. It wasn’t just us who noticed the suspicious resemblance between the music used in the advertisement above and Broken Bells’ track “The Ghost Inside” — Stereogum blogged about it, among others — and if you have a listen to the original, it’s hard to see this as anything other than a pretty shameless piece of musical naughtiness.

The original:

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Bell (a Canadian cellphone provider) is currently airing a commercial for an HTC phone. Completely distinguishable rip off of Phoenix's Lisztomania, but apparently the band allowed McDonalds and some car company to use their songs. Still extremely annoying!

How about the recent Old Navy VS. Human League

So sad. Less sad, because the song is so dumb, I just noticed that Dragonet song ripped off in a McDonald's commercial, but used in a trident commercial.

Jaybone, it's because Ad people generally have the artistic egos of Picasso, along with the actual imagination of white bread. I say this as someone who works in the industry... They just can't imagine why an artist wouldn't want to be associated with SUCH! A! COOL! PRODUCT!!!

That ersatz Tom Waits thing Audi used sounds so conspicuously awful that one wonders if perhaps they made it as a kind of revenge. Because they were turned down, Audi wanted people to think it really was a Tom Waits track and therefore his music is total shit. I'm kidding, of course, but I don't understand why a company simply doesn't use a different song or concept after being turned down by the particular artist they were after. I mean, you know, given the near infinite possibilities of the imagination and everything!

I wonder how many of these situations are similar to the one Fleet Foxes wrote about a while ago: "Tell them you'll anonymously record a sound-a-like, since they'll probably hire someone to do one anyways. @___@ [...] All the cash, no cred loss, when it airs you'll seem like a victim to the evil ad machine... the perfect crime." http://pitchfork.com/news/41032-echo-chamber-fleet-foxes-give-career-advice-to-the-pains-of-being-pure-at-heart