Oscar’s Most Insane, Illogical Award Choices

This year’s Academy Awards are just around the corner (well, okay, they’re still a week and a half away, so it’s more like around the corner, down a little, second door on the left), and while we can’t help but get a little excited about Hollywood’s big night, we’re also being very careful to keep our expectations in check. We’ve already lamented the many worthwhile films and performances that were unduly snubbed by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences at the nominations phase; when Sunday the 26th rolls around, you can bet the farm that the AMPAS will confound us again by making at least a couple of spectacularly bone-headed choices. There’s a long and storied history of the Oscar simply going to the wrong damn person or movie, countless cases where a peek back at the list of nominees and the eventual winner provokes confusion, rage, or at the very least, a bit of head-scratching. After the jump, we’ve gathered ten of the most egregious examples.

BEST ACTOR WINNER 1998: Roberto Benigni (Life Is Beautiful)
WON OVER: Edward Norton (American History X), Ian McKellen (Gods and Monsters), Nick Nolte (Affliction)

Good God in heaven, where do we even start with Life is Beautiful? It was bad enough that writer/director/star Roberto Benigni’s soppy attempt to make his own Day the Clown Cried rode the unstoppable Miramax Oscar-buying machine to statues for Best Foreign Film and Best Score; Benigni’s insufferable, mug-tastic performance winning Best Actor was a bridge too far. Going home empty-handed that evening were Edward Norton, whose fierce and unforgettable turn in American History X is one of his best; Sir Ian McKellen, who was subtle, understated, and unforgettable as closeted Hollywood director James Whale in Gods and Monsters; and Nick Nolte, burying his customary tics and affectations in the complex portrayal of a wounded son in Affliction.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Munich was terrible and boring. Anna Paquin is an over-actor. Jason Robards Jr was barely in All The President's Men and it was bewildering he won.

I COMPLETELY agree with your assessment on 'Crash', and the description of your "falling out" with the Oscars, as it were, sounds exactly like mine. However, I (somehow) made it through the 'Crash' debacle, and my final straw came when the Academy shafted Peter O'Toole for the 8th and final time. I love Forrest Whitaker, but the writing wasn't there and he was fed a one-dimensional character; O'Toole was brilliant in 'Venus', and deserved to be the bride not the bridesmaid for freaking once.

Sean Penn in Mystic River over Bill Murray in Lost in Translation. Bill Murray should have won, hands down.

Couldn't agree more on Roberto Benigni and Life is Beautiful. If mugging for the camera and non-stop chatter an award-winning performance make, then I guess Roberto "I Never Stop Talking" Benigni deserved his Oscar. As for Fun with Nazis...er, I mean, Life is Beautiful - a maudlin, obnoxious fairy tale that trivializes the Holocaust. Crash winning best picture? If I want to spend two hours being hit over the head with the Message Hammer, I'll rent a TV movie of the week. And then there is Titanic. What was Cameron thinking? "I know! Let's have Billy Zane run around shooting a gun, because a massive ship breaking in half and sinking just isn't quite dramatic enough!" Oh, Oscar. You make me sad.

1948 Best Writing, Original Screenplay WINNER The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer: Sidney Sheldon NOMINEES Body and Soul: Abraham Polonsky A Double Life: Ruth Gordon, Garson Kanin Monsieur Verdoux: Charles Chaplin Shoeshine: Sergio Amidei, Adolfo Franci, Cesare Giulio Viola, Cesare Zavattini

1954 Grace Kelly (The Country Girl) winning over Judy Garland (A Star Is Born) ... how did that not make this list?

Totally on the money, particularly the Gump & How Green fiascos. Personally the not-even-nominated snubs cause most of my (frequent) Oscar break-ups. It's one thing when voters make "mistakes" another entirely when the Academy says "nah, you're not even good enough for a nomination." Off the top of my head; No Cinematography or either of the two Sound categories for Blade Runner (I get the Director snub - the Academy has a problem with the more overt genres). SIDEBAR - Ridley Scott's first 3 films are The Duellists, Alien and Blade Runner, with NO major noms? Then in 1986 - we have nothing for Goldblum's heart-breaking pre-schtick turn in The Fly? But the 68th Awards were particularly egregious... Heat gets snubbed for Director and Cinematography, but at least it got Best Supporting Actor, Editing and Sound nominations...oh wait NO IT DIDN'T. Yes, that's right Heat was nominated for exactly NONE AT ALL Academy Awards. Sure Heat polarizes, but in the year they gave The Usual Suspects (witty and engaging, but very tricksy and um..."surface") Best Screenplay, they don't even nominate Heat's rich exploration of the mirroring of law enforcement and criminal behaviour? Okay, at least they made up for it by acknowledging the ground-breaking Se7en with... Wait what? ONE nomination? SIDEBAR - Neither Heat nor Se7en were nominated for Sound Editing, which only had three films that year. And Batman Forever was one of them. Jebus Wept. What happened in LA in 1996? Well I guess at least Fincher felt better four years later when Fight Club got a bunch of noms at the 72nd Academy Awards... You what now? ...only Best Sound Editing? Which it didn't win? Good one humans, good one. I could go on.

Don't get me wrong here, Goodfellas is a masterpiece for sure and one of the best crime movies ever made. But I am not ashamed to say that I love Dances With Wolves. The only reason these two movies are ever compared to each other is because they were both nominated for Oscars during the same year. Otherwise, they have absolutely nothing in common. Regardless, I think both movies hold up exceptionally well today and I revisit both from time to time. The year Forrest Gump won was another instance where I really like that film. I also love The Shawshank Redemption and Pulp Fiction, but I have always found Forrest Gump to be moving. Plus I think Tom Hanks was great. It's just too bad Eric Roth was so lazy when adapting The Curious Case of Benjamin Button that he basically did a revision of his Forrest Gump script. Titanic winning 11 Oscars also doesn't bother me much. Sure, the film has problems (especially with some banal dialogue) but it's such a well crafted film and a great experience that I vividly remember going to see the film in the theater when I was 7 years old and it left a great impression on me. The love story is definitely melodramatic and could have been a complete failure, but the acting and chemistry between Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet is excellent, in my opinion. Good Will Hunting and L.A. Confidential are also great movies, and I liked The Full Monty and As Good As It Gets. But out of all the nominees from that year, Titanic is the one film that felt like the kind of experience you rarely get at the movies these days. Plus I'm a sucker for old fashioned Hollywood epic filmmaking. As for Benigni's win, I don't really have a problem with that. I know lots do, and others don't, but I thought he did a good job in Life is Beautiful. Admittedly, it took me about 30 minutes for his performance to grow on me, but by the end I thought it was heartbreaking. I also really enjoy Shakespeare in Love, and Saving Private Ryan was good as well, but I would have to give my vote that year for The Thin Red Line as the best picture of the year. That movie holds up for me better than any of the other nominees from that year. And finally, the problem with Crash. The only other movie that I thought was worse of those nominees was Capote. I couldn't stand that film, with the exception of Phillip Seymour Hoffman's incredible performance. I thought Crash was quite powerful the first time I saw it, but I've seen it two or three times since and I have to say it loses its impact on repeated viewings and I notice the flaws more. I liked Brokeback Mountain a lot the first time, but it's the kind of film that gets even better for me on repeated viewings and is a really haunting story that sticks with you long after it ends. I don't think it's quite the flawless masterwork that many other critics do, but it's definitely the kind of classic that will be talked about for decades. Good Night and Good Luck was also very good, as was Munich, which is arguably Spielberg's most mature work to date. Although I don't understand how Kramer vs. Kramer beat Apocalypse Now for Best Picture and Best Director. Especially the latter. Insanity.

I agree with Forrest Gump, it was a good movie but in 1994 Shawshank Redemption didn't get a single oscar

Nicole Kidman winning over Salma Hayek. Kidman was great as Wolf but she was featured for just a third of The Hours, Salma spent the whole of Frida front and center and her performance was raw and amazing and I doubt she'll ever get the chance to play a character like that. Still haven't forgiven Oscars for that.

Mine would have to be when Cate Blanchett losing to Gwyneth Paltrow

My love affair with Oscar ended when Titanic won.

I'd give a little justification for Hanks' defeat for "Cast Away" --the man had come from back-to-back Oscars for "Philadelphia" and "Forrest Gump", so probably giving him a third one might have been a career-ender. (Considering how his career has gone since, though, maybe they should have just giving it to him and be done with it).

You missed the single biggest injustice in Oscar history... in 1979 Kramer vs. Kramer winning Best Picture over four other films that were infinitely better... All That Jazz, Breaking Away, Norma Rae, and...wait for it...Apocalypse Now. More than 30 years later those other four movies are all memorable at least and considered a masterpiece at best. Kramer vs. Kramer is, and was, completely forgettable.

Kevin Spacey "American Beauty" over Denzel Washington for "Hurricane". Marcia Gay Harden for "Pollock" instead of Kate Hudson for "Almost Famous".

I'm sorry, but I found "Munich" to be more pedantic and artless than "Crash"; Spielberg likes nothing more than bashing people over the head with his point. He makes movies for the lowest common denominator. When he's having fun, the movies are great--but when he's trying to teach something or make a serious point, subtlety is really not his strong suit. I was willing to call it a decent film, right up until the last 30 seconds. And then Spielberg killed it. (And Eric Bana in the lead? Really?) "Crash", on the other hand--I went in knowing nothing about it, before the Oscar noms, and walked out raving. Not knowing what to expect, I got a lot more for my money than I expected. Better than "Brokeback", or "Good Night and Good Luck"? Possibly not. Better than "Capote"? Hell no. But it didn't hurt my feelings. "Munich" winning would have made me break my television.

Benigni's Life is Beautiful is such a good movie and his performance was Oscar worthy. Holocaust is not something normally put together with humor and I think he showed - in the best comedia dell arte tradition - how humor can help people get through trauma! I do not get the 1995 Braveheart win - boring and filled with errors! This was the year of The Usual Suspects and Se7en which didn't even get nominated for best film!??

Gweneth Paltrow in Shakespear In Love over Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth. A complete joke.

Tommy Lee Jones (The Fugitive) Best Supporting Actor over Leonardo DiCaprio in What's Eating Gilbert Grape. TLJ is a great actor, but that was just wrong

Crash winning best picture lost me the Oscar pool that year. But I'll take the hit since I could not approve of that movie even on such an low-stakes level. It's not a bad movie (I guess) but it just wasn't better than the other nominees. I'll also support the Roberto Benigni win. It's not like the academy ever recognizes that kind of actor and he was great in that movie.

Yeah, take it easy on Life is Beautiful. I've seen much worse! My pick would be F. Murray Abraham over Tom Hulce in 1984 for Amadeus. Granted, that's a tough pick. I think that is simply the case sometimes. Too many good choices.

One of the biggest was Russell Crowe winning best actor for Gladiator over Tom Hanks for Cast Away. Don't get me wrong, Gladiator was an amazing movie, but I'd argue that Crowe wasn't even the best actor in it (Joaquin Phoenix). Hanks completely carried the ENTIRE movie.

My bad! Just saw that tinker tailor is thankfully not nominated! With all the rave reviews I thought it would be.

I agree that a beautiful life was an excellent movie and that benigni deservedly won. Personally (maybe also because i am a native angeleno who has lived and worked in the more ethnic parts of LA) I thought Crash was an excellent movie and deserved the Oscar, Munich was also excellent and I would've been happy if that won. Good night & good luck was incredibly boring and overrated same with this year's big nominee tinker tailor boring suck. My biggest heartbreak was of course when pulp fiction lost best picture. Ordinary People was also incredibly overrated and I think Elephant Man should've won- even over raging bull.

Julia Roberts over Ellen Burstyn.

The 2 biggest oversights in my opinion, besides ones already listed, Julia Roberts winning over Ellen Burstyn (Requiem for a Dream) and Björk's non-nomination for 'Dancer in the Dark'...travesty's both.

Mostly agree but a vigorous no on How Green Was My Valley. Citizen Kane, at this point in its mythology, is overrated. Try watching it again and not think that it drags in places. That it's basically an ego-driven showcase for Welles, one of the biggest egos in Hollywood history. It's a film that celebrates style over substance and actually has no heart. Now go back and watch "Valley." It's breathtakingly beautiful - almost every frame is a perfect black & white photograph. Alfred Newman's Oscar winning score is one of his best ever. As for heart...I rest my case.

* Three 6 Mafia, excuse me

The day Julia Roberts won for Erin Brockovich over Ellen Burstyn in Requiem For a Dream. That was the day I stopped wanting an Oscar. Oh and I think the whole charade was neatly summed up by Jon Stewart. The year he hosted was the year Three Dog Mafia won for the best song (Hustle and Flow). After the break, Mr. Stewart came back, looked at the camera and said "For those of you keeping score at home, that's Three Dog Mafia: 1; Martin Scorsese: 0

I totally disagree about Roberto Benigni. Life Is Beautiful remains a beautiful, well-crafted film, and his performance and enthusiasm at the Oscars alone is great enough that I think he should deserve it. Besides, Edward Norton, Sir Ian McKellen and Nick Nolte are all fabulous enough that they're doing alright with the enormous honor that is at least the Oscar nod.

Yup, 2005. I almost cried. It really was a year of great movies (hasn't happened again eversince in my opinion). But Crash? It's basically a made-for-tv movie with really expensive actors.

Have to say I loved Lee Marvin's "Cat Ballou" performance. Comedy is so seldom recognized with a Best Actor/Actress award. Anyway, expecting the Academy voters to cast ballots based on sheer brilliance of performance is like asking Americans to vote "for the good of the country" and not based on personal politics. Voters rationalize their votes based on what films they've actually seen, personal insights (and gossip and rumors) about the nominees, and plain old "you scratch my back..." brown-nosing. Like almost every awards show out there, it's about popularity and industry politics. (BTW, Michael Shannon was so robbed for "Take Shelter.")

Jennifer Hudson in the horrible film "Dreamgirls" over Cate Blanchett in "Notes on a scandal" has to to be the most insane choice ever. Someone must have been paid off!!

Benigni's film and portrayal was superb. It's no wonder that it is one of the only foreign language films to yield a top acting prize. Not only that the whole point of the film and portrayal is poignancy, that despite the backdrop of a horrific event, positivity can still be found. Surely that's something to embrace rather than mock?

I could not agree more about the head-scratching win of what you artfully describe as the "utterly artless" film, "Crash." I practically fell out of my chair when it won Best Picture over the beautiful "Brokeback Mountain" and the brilliant "Munich." Six years later, I'm riled every time I think of it. (And no nomination for Eric Bana's haunting performance? Are you freakin' KIDDING me? What a travesty!) I was extremely moved by both "Munich" and "Brokeback Mountain"--films that stirred up thought and emotion and have stayed with me for years. That, to me, is the mark of a Best Picture winner.

Sandra Freagin Bullock over Gabourey Sidibe, Meryl Streep, Carey Mulligan and Helen Mirren.