Oh Pitchfork. Sure, we have a love/hate relationship with your rants and album ratings (to say nothing of the actually occasionally awesome tracks reviews), but what are you doing with Wavves? First you pluck a random group of lo-fi noise-niks out of obscurity, sending the awesome (but completely inaccessible) act soaring through the indie-rock roof. Then, when the unexpected, unwelcome (?), and all-too-fast adoration rips mastermind Nathan Williams apart, causing a very public meltdown at Barcelona’s Primavera Sound Festival, you publicize the crap out of it.
Now, you proceed to publish an explanatory interview chronicling the breakdown in an attempt (?) to build Wavves back up. SRSLY? In the interview, Williams admits to only having been playing as Wavves for four months before fame hit. This SRSLY certificate comes with a healthy helping of “come one guys: stop screwing with the lives of up-and-coming artists!”
Comments (5)
are you stupid?? completely inaccessible?? have you even listened to wavves??
or what if they don't hype a Amateur with dubious chops? that would work too… pitchfork is just reporting we are the idiots listening.
yes, i have. i like them. But if you think they are "accessible" in even the most remote mainstream sense, you are pretty up your own ass ;)
why don't you go fuck yrself in the ass you pretentious indie prick, are you fucking retarded?? wavves is completely accessible to the mainstream of the underground. look at the yeah yeah yeahs, tv on the radio, arcade fire, all those fucking bands get on the radio with their accessible shit and wavves are right up on their level. GODDAMNIT ANDY YR SOFA KING FUCK FUCK FUCKING RETARDED APESHEIT!!!!!!111
♥
~Mr_Zoo
Mr_Zoo for President, yeah man Wavves or fucking awesome, they or the crazk cocaine of music man.
Post a new comment