While it’s entertaining enough so far that I plan to keep watching, Veep does have one major problem that is only going to get bigger unless it’s addressed: its protagonist. HBO’s press notes introduce Selina as “a rising star in her party, a charismatic leader who seemed to have unlimited potential” and had been pegged as a promising presidential candidate before sinking to the apparently degrading position of VP. But we see none of this charisma or potential in the character, who bungles her way through speeches and receptions and meetings like a combination of Michael Scott and Liz Lemon, with none of Leslie Knope’s redeeming sweetness. Now, Ianucci is known for his portraits of spiky, narcissistic politicians (in addition to In the Loop, he created the BBC British government satire The Thick of It), so it doesn’t surprise me that Selina is somewhat unlikable. What throws the show out of the realm of believability is how little she has to offer as a whole. The vice president doesn’t need to be intelligent, magnetic, principled, savvy and well-connected, but to become the second most powerful figure in American politics (at least on paper), Selina should be at least one of those things.
What separates Veep from other shows set in the White House — most notably The West Wing — is that Ianucci is less interested in exploring actual issues than exposing politicians as the crude, selfish, small-minded bureaucrats that many of them likely are. In a recent Daily Show interview, Louis-Dreyfus told Jon Stewart that we’ll never find out whether Selina is a Republican or Democrat. That’s fine with me, but there’s still something missing. There’s a reason the self-important careerists we elect to represent us are senators and vice presidents, not middle managers at paper companies in Pennsylvania. If Veep fails to shed any light on what makes us trust these people with our future, then it’s never going to fully succeed as satire.
Photo credits: Bill Gray/HBO