Remarkable Pencil Drawings That Blur Photorealism and Hyperrealism

We’re generally fascinated by photorealistic drawing and painting here at Flavorpill, if only for the intimidating degree of technical skill involved. But for all that being able to create a crazily realistic drawing or painting is a neat trick, it ultimately remains a trick only if the subject matter’s not interesting enough to justify the work. It’s for this reason that we found the work of Glaswegian artist Paul Cadden — which we stumbled across via Scene 360 — rather interesting. Cadden describes his work as not so much photorealism as hyperrealism: “Although the drawings and paintings I make are based upon photographs, videos stills etc, the idea is to go beyond the photograph … The virtual image becomes the living image, an intensification of the normal.” It’s an interesting idea, and the results are fascinating — check out a selection after the jump, and visit Cadden’s website to see more.

Image credit: Paul Cadden

Image credit: Paul Cadden

Image credit: Paul Cadden

Image credit: Paul Cadden

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

pete and sarah, you are completely correct. its pure jealousy. to say its wasted time due to the fact we have cameras and copiers just plain embarrass me. they are beautiful and the cropping of the images make the composition even more beautiful. i cannot wait till i can become half as talented. stick to your computers, copiers, and cameras. we who enjoy making the art as well as sharing it will prevail.

p.s. In response to 'time wasted'; no REAL artist whatsoever will call ANY artwork a waste of time.

I agree Pete! I cannot believe some of the negative comments made here. The attention to detail is amazing and only makes me think that the negative comments are from those who are insanely jealous and that they cannot achieve the same.

Midy grow a brain. When you can do half as well I'd like to see your work. There is a fantastic level of dimension in these pieces, especiallly the last one. The guy is an exceptional artist and you are just too pig headed to give credit where its due.

Seeing them on a computer screen is nothing like seeing them in person, where it would be obvious, upon closer inspection, that they are indeed drawings. Those questioning the validity of such art or dismissing it as wasted time have no clue about the passion that drives certain artists to do what they do.

These drawings are very good “realistic” drawings, however I can’t help but feel that all that time spent making these drawings look like photographs was wasted. We have cameras and photocopiers for a reason. This just took about one million times longer to create. Very good attention to detail though.

These drawings are very good "realistic" drawings, however I can't help but feel that all that time spent making these drawings look like photographs was wasted. We have cameras and photocopiers for a reason. This just took about one million times longer to create. Very good attention to detail though.

These images don't really have anything to do with realism. They are copies of photographs and being so, retain a curious two dimensional flatness. That's not real at all. Realism requires some form of interpretation of three dimensional objects. By interpretation I mean transformation onto a 2-D surface. There's not one wit of that present in these drawings.

I do like the first one, though.

If these are supposed to be 100% drawn with pencil, no tracing or inclusion of photograph? --I have a hard time believing it. "Detroit" (the last one), in particular, is too realistic, if you can understand that: There's indication that it is "real," which the realist strives for; but they also must strive for communication that it is truly 'drawn.' I can't fuss with this art--I think it's kitsch.