Would You Read a Novel Written by the Internet?

Crowdsourcing isn’t anything new, but a novel crowdsourced sentence by sentence? That could get pretty interesting — or it could be a complete train wreck. Enter The Collabowriters, an experiment hosted by Chicago-based artist and storyteller Willy Chyr, which aims to create a novel written “by the internet” by allowing users to submit sentences and vote on their favorites, building the story (or lack thereof) line by line. He explains, “For each sentence, anyone can enter a submission (up to 140 characters). Users then vote on each submission, giving it a score of either +1 or -1. The submission with the highest score becomes the sentence in the novel, or at least until another submission surpasses its score.” So far, the novel only consists of a few paragraphs, which seem pretty okay, if a little overwritten — but then again, we can understand how the flashiest sentences might get the most votes every time, even if it makes the whole thing a little adverb-heavy. So what’s the verdict — will you submit your own sentence? Would you be interested in reading a novel written by the internet? Let us know what you think in the comments! [via GalleyCat]

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Those paragraphs are unreadable. Even under the best of circumstances, novelistic collaborations have never produced anything remotely canonical. The people working on that internet novel really should just quit while they're not too far behind.

As an English teacher, I have used similar, scaled down activities to encourage peer collaboration and to have kids appreciate the effort it takes to write, but I'm pretty sure I would not read a novel written in this format. Novels are so personal. However, I would be intrigued to see a final product.

I was initially taken a-back by this. I figured itd be people trying to cram as many metaphors and adjectives as possible into each sentence. But after checking it out, its a really neat writing exercise. Though the sentences ultimately come from an individual, they are hardly "individual" for a few reasons. 1st, the novel is already developed enough that you cant just go anywhere with your sentence. Based on the sentences before - and even paragraphs before -ones options are limited when it comes to advancing the story. Not terribly limited, but their is a structure one must follow and adapt to, much like a structured writing exercise (the sentence length is also limited to the length of a tweet) 2nd, as a community project, the community chooses what sentence is passed on. This community's wants, desires, sympathies, and artistry forms the "individual's perspective on the world" that apeetha alludes to in the previous comment. Its really like an individual is created through a democratic process - the emotions and logic of the next sentence reflects a ratio of the community, and these ratios change based on the possibilities of the sentence. its not the answer to the next great novel, its a writers workshop and social experiment combined. and pretty fun.

nope. I wouldn't write. I consider writing a private activity. Of course, the past, the myths and a community and collective history make an individual but the writing that comes out is essentially a product of an individual's perspective on the world. No, I wouldn't read it nor participate. It's a nice idea- cannot be called "novel" (pun intended)