Ranking Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce Employees by Moral Reprehensibility

As with most great fiction, personal morality has always been a central concern for Mad Men. What makes someone a good or bad person? Do intentions count, or are we defined by our actions? Does a rough past justify selfishness now? How does the amoral nature of the advertising industry affect the people who work in it? Is Don Draper essentially good or evil? But while these questions usually linger in the background, playing out over a season or throughout the course of the entire series, Sunday’s episode thrust them to the fore. In observing how the partners of Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce react to the possibility of trading a night with Joan for the agency’s first car account, we learned a great deal about each character’s ethical compass. In the aftermath of that showstopping hour, it seems like a good time to rank SCDP’s employees from least to most morally reprehensible. Let us know if you agree in the comments.

Michael Ginsberg

Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce’s newest copywriter is an oddball, that’s for sure. But Michael is also the most morally upright of the bunch, often expressing disgust at his colleagues’ ruthless attitudes and callous humor. In the most recent episode, we saw him turn away uncomfortably when Megan’s friend showed up at the office to provide some, er, entertainment for the overworked men.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Who knew that morally ranking Mad Men characters could serve as a kind of misogynist rorschach test?

Pete Campbell for the win, hands down. I really hope he doesn't die in the final episode as rumored. The fact that we all feel such hatred for his character is a testament to Vincent Kartheiser's brilliant performance. He deserves an Emmy for his work this season. After Pete, I would rank Roger Sterling, Don Draper, and Lane Pryce, in that order.

I am shocked at how depressed this episode has made me. I've been dragging about for two days. God I love this show.

uh, am I the only one who remembers Peggy consensually sleeping with Pete, having a baby, then completely abandoning her son like it never happened because it was putting a cramp in her career? She should easily be higher (lower?) on this list. Plus she gave a handy to some random dude in a theater. Girl's got issues.

Bravo!!! Excellent character assessment!

Two to tango? Tell that to the au pair. How strange that Joan gets excoriated for her sexuality, when she was not the one cheating. Do the men get a pass for both adultery AND rape? That most of the partners were perfectly willing to pimp her for the sake of a contract suggests how little they value her, and it was this realization that factored into her decision. Had she taken the high road, they would have resented her.

HAHA! The great thing about this show is that they're all capable of morally suspect decisions. Pete, Pete, Pete. All the way. And I agree--Kartheiser's performance is perfect. Lane's deceptions actually have positive consequences for other people, which is an amusing twist.

why wouldn't Joan get into heaven? double standard much

Pete is such a weasel. I loved it when Lane laid him out!

I'll shed a tear for losing Vincent Kartheiser's spectacular performance as Pete Campbell. It takes deep talent to make someone so baby faced so believable as a reprehensible rat.

Although,she is not part of SCDP so makes sense.

Where is Betty in all this? Worst.mother.ever!

I'm with Sunnyside. Lane's efforts to steer Joan were solely for his best interests. And as deplorable as Pete is in the pilot, it takes two to tango - don't forget, she slept with Pete a second time, in the office a few episodes later. Not to mention completely disowning the child they conceived. Also, is it all gravy to give hand-jobs in the movie theater now? If so, I gotta go see Avengers or something.

sounds like Sunnyside up there also belongs on the list.

Great list, although I wouldn't place Harry so high (or low?). I think he's more bumbling than simply amoral. (Giggle to the Alex Mack reference.) I mostly agree with Sunnyside about Lane. While he does care for Joan, and might have suggested her asking for a stake in the company even if he wasn't embezzling, did you notice that the amount that Bert suggested they take out as a credit line ($50k) was the exact amount that he had already taken as a line and passed off as a surplus? Even I winced for him in that moment. I would say that his cover up to his feelings for Joan was about 60-40. (Sidenote: I'm glad to see Joan as a partner. It fits. Just sorry that this is the way that it had to come about. Do you think, had this situation not come up, that they would have made her a partner if she'd just asked? I don't either.) I thought Roger would be tops, but I had forgotten about Pete. Slimeball. I feel bad for Trudy, she seems sweet.

Don't forget about Pete's Rape of the Au Pair a few seasons ago. UGH. He's a sociopath.

@Sunnyside You're right about the embezzlement, but I don't think it was the ONLY reason Lane suggested Joan demand a share of the company. If you're keeping such a close eye on the show, you'll have noticed that he does care about her. Meanwhile, there's some serious victim blaming in your suggestion that Joan marrying her rapist finance makes HER immoral. That's not how abusive relationships work. Also, in general, it is the married person's responsibility not to cheat -- the person they cheat with isn't the keeper of their relationship. And if you don't think Peggy felt pressured to sleep with Pete because of his power over her in the company, you've thoroughly misunderstood that entire scenario.

Correction about Lane: Do you actually watch the show? Lane advised Joan to demand a share of the company so that the discovery of his embezzlement would be delayed. Also, I would say Joan is more morally corrupt than Lane in general. This is a woman who had an affair with a married man (that qualifies as adultery) for the better part of a decade, accepting furs, career advancement and other favors along the way. She also married her rapist fiance because he was a doctor. She then conceived her child on a dingy street while her husband was away at war. Finally, she was the one who whored herself out... she could have refused. (After 13 years at the firm, she was valued, made a good living and they would not have kicked her out if she found the notion offensive.) Harry Crane... Again, do you watch this show? I imagine you placed him near Pete only to illicit comments from your readers. He belongs somewhere near Peggy Olson (who, by the way, slept with a man she knew had a fiancee).

I would rank Lane lower on this list (or higher?), what with the embezzlement and all. Certainly he's farther down the morally terrible scale than Cooper is. I'm surprised the Ayn Rand fans haven't jumped on your criticism of Cooper yet, though!

Good list...I'd forgotten some of those details about Bert Cooper. I do feel that Harry Crane could be put a bit lower than #2. Yes, he's a scumbag with women, but then so are most of his male colleagues. We may notice it more with Harry because he's so bad at it. And didn't his "intervention" with Paul Kinsey have SOME altruistic intent? Also, if you expanded the list to non-SCDP employees, Betty Francis would certainly be near the top...besides the bad mothering, the way she fired Carla last season still sticks in my craw!