Contemporary Authors We Think We’ll Still Be Reading in 100 Years

Earlier this week, we read a fascinating article over at The New Yorker that asked the question, “why is literary fame so unpredictable?” Apparently, in 1929, the readers of The Manchester Guardian were asked to vote on the authors they thought would still be read widely in 2029, and their top choice was John Galsworthy, who — though he won the Nobel Prize for The Forsyte Saga in 1932 — is now relatively unknown, or at least not very popular. The article goes on to discuss the difficulty in making predictions of literary prestige over long periods of time, noting a couple things that might give clues (a staunch but small readership of fellow authors, for one). While we concur that this kind of thing often rests on chance, fashion and unforeseeable future circumstance, we thought we’d take a stab at rounding up a few of the contemporary (read: living) authors we think we might still be reading in 100 years. Click through to see our predictions, and let us know your own in the comments.

Gabriel García Márquez

In addition to having written several beautiful novels (and, you know, having been awarded the Nobel Prize), Márquez is the figurehead of magical realism, a literary style that he popularized with the success of One Hundred Years of Solitude. So if nothing else, the author will at least be forever remembered and studied in conjunction with that stylistic trend, and his popularity will likely shift along with it.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

apreciado escritor una vez mas le escribo que la mayoria de venezolanos te apreciamos y le deseamos buena salud, amor y alegria. QUE DIOS Y LA VIRGEN TE PROTEJAN SIEMRE.

I agree with the vote for John Galsworthy, someone I read in the 1950's and still read with even more appreciation. And even though Margaret Mitchell isn't considered literary by many, she gets my loyal support for Gone With the Wind.

I think Albert Camus will definitely be there.

@Luke: I think Pynchon'll be read in 100 years, but as college curriculum more than anything. Few will probably seek out his work on their own. @John Murphy: Just because you don't like Rowling doesn't mean that she won't still be read in 100 years. So, I believe you're wrong.

This would have to include Harper Lee who is still alive, has one of the biggest hits of a novel ever and is already on most peoples lists of favorite books even though it's been about half a century since it was written.

Thomas Pynchon, obviously. Shocking omission.

Ian McEwan? Kazuo Ishiguro? Mary Gaitskill? Margaret Atwood?

Dispatches by Michael Herr, anything by McCarthy, Franzen, Philip Roth, John Irving and Dellilo

No Don DeLillo? Underworld and White Noise capture the last 30 years in American culture and are some of the most important novels during that time.

“authors who consistently write best-sellers will not last, but every lasting author needs at least one best-seller.” Tell that to Charles Dickens.

I would personally add Carlos Fuentes and George R. R. Martin to this list.

one of my favourite authors , he writes with heart.

It is Garcia Marquez and not Marquez. Garcia is the "main" lastname and Marquez the mother's maiden name.

I'm a little disappointed not to see Michael Chabon and Jeffrey Eugenides on this list. I mean, they wrote two of the best 20th Century-based American period dramas of the last decade; "Kavalier and Clay" will especially endure if graphic writing becomes more embraced as e-reading expands, because that book is such a profound insight into that industry. Possibly also Junot Diaz, though that's likely a long shot.

Having worked in a literary bookstore for 35 years and having taught literature at University, I would say that Marquez, Rowling, Morrison, and Roth are the most likely candidates. Although Roth may date. To be read in a century you have to have written a classic which appeals long after the setting and specific circumstances have faded. Rowling will be read by children forever, I think, because her books aren't dependant on passing things but enduring things: archetype. Likewise Marquez and Morrison. Anything quirky automatically has less of a chance . Readers find their new quirky.

Interesting and thought- provoking. My opinion? You missed Marilynne Robinson. You're wrong on Rowling and King and Morrison. Definitely correct on McCarthy who will last the longest of all of them.

If people aren't reading Infinite Jest in 100 years' time, something has gone seriously wrong with the world

Whether people like it or not, I'm pretty sure Franzen will be part of this century's canon. (Wallace too, but he is of course no longer 'contemporary')

Pretty agreeable list. Rowling and Garcia Marquez are the most likely candidates, I think. I mean, Rowling now has readers passing the Potter books to their kids, and so on and so on. Like Norton Juster and Madeline L'Engle. Due to his early death, DFW, too, probably will be read in 100 years.