10 Movies We’d Actually Like to See Remade

In his 1996 review of Cop Land, Roger Ebert wrote that a reader once asked him “why they only remake the good movies, not bad ones. Good films don’t require remaking… but what about ‘promising concepts which were poorly executed for one reason or another?’” It’s a question we ask ourselves every time Hollywood decides to remake a perfectly good movie. This week, for example, we have the big-budget, Colin Farrell-fronted remake of Total Recall, a perfectly good Schwarzenegger/Verhoeven picture from 1990 that marries Philip K. Dick’s “We Can Remember It for You Wholesale” to the boom-crash action aesthetic of the period, and which stands up just fine these days, thank you very much.

But Ebert and his reader might be on to something — if the suits are going to insist on spending all of their time and money developing remakes, why not remake some movies that didn’t turn out so well, and try to get them right this time? Or better yet, good movies that no one saw, so you’re not doing the original any damage by taking a chance on a copy? With those parameters in mind, we put together this list of movies we frankly wouldn’t mind seeing remade; check it out after the jump, and contribute yours in the comments.

Tequila Sunrise

The experience of watching this 1988 movie is a bit depressing, considering how good you’d think it’d be: it’s written and directed by Robert Towne, the great screenwriter of Chinatown, Shampoo, and The Last Detail; it’s got a sexy love triangle between Mel Gibson, Michelle Pfeiffer, and Kurt Russell; and the supporting cast includes such MVPs as Raul Julia and J.T. Walsh. But the trouble is, the movie itself is just so… ’80s. The DNA of Miami Vice is all over the film stylistically, and the centerpiece musical track of its soundtrack is “Surrender to Me,” which, y’know, good luck getting out of your brain now. Towne’s script is a good one (his almost always are), but the film itself ages very badly — a fresh take could certainly work (maybe with Towne giving the script a fresh pass?), with, say, Tom Hardy, Angelina Jolie, and Mark Wahlberg taking over?

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I just recently watched seems like old times and actually thought this would be fun to remake with kate hudson and mathew mcconahey. Kate paying homage to her mother...

Good suggestions. I never wanted a remake of "The Big Chill" but always wished there were a sequel. Of course, like most sequels it probably would not have lived up to the brilliance of the first movie. I totally agree that "The Sting" should not be remade. If I really like the first version of a movie, I have a hard time seeing the remake, but I suppose there have been some good efforts over the years.

How about a remake of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy? I know the movie was fairly recent but it is sad that such a great book ended up as a subpar movie. Get Dylan Moran as Arthur Dent, John Barrowman as Ford Prefect, Billie Piper as Trillian, Jonathan Rhys Meyers as Zaphod, and Steven Wright as the voice of Martin the Paranoid Android and I think we would have a winner!

You lost a major point when you suggested that Apatow 'punch up' Neil Simon. Oh, God... no! You regained a major point by spotlighting 'Silent Partner', one of my all-time fave undiscovered films. Finally, we shouldn't remake "Brewster's Miliions" (not again! they get lamer and lamer...) even though WB announced it in 2009, and like the Mr. Deeds remake it would suffer the same fate of casting and concept. Instead we should remake one of the funniest comedies ever, the very little seen "Magic Christian". The idea of a very eccentric billionaire using his wealth to mess with people's heads is very appealing to me; think "Punk'd" with a huge cash payoff....

wow, these are all really thoughtful suggestions. is hollywood listening (yet)?

In Time. God what a disappointment that was. Interesting concept, terrible execution. I'd love to see it redone with a proper script and better actors.

Boxing Helena. No, really. That one's just begging for better acting, better styling, and more than anything, a whole lot better than that copout ending.

Cop Land came out in 1997. Unless Ebert is a precog, he couldn't have written the review in 1996.

Not to quibble, but for the sake of clarity, Hollywood only had to reach "way back" to 1982 to adapt The Rocketeer. That character was an indie comic homage to, among other things, the Republic serials of the 30's and 40's, but The Rocketeer himself wasn't yet 10 years old when the film adaptation was released.

The Rocketeer was created in the 1980s, but the stories were set in the 1930s. He was likely inspired from rocket heroes of that earlier era: Buck Rogers (1920s-1950s) and Commando Cody (1950s).

Without a doubt, I would like to see Hollywood take another crack at THE BLACK DAHLIA. Brian DePalma clearly did not bring his A game to that set in 2006. He failed to get his arms around the sprawling narrative, replacing it instead with a nonstop parade of 1940s clothes and cars. It's a compelling story (from the James Ellroy novel) and it deserves proper screen treatment. Anyone listening out there?

I fully realize that your lists almost always contain a "zinger" (or two..or all) intended to cause fierce debate but how DARE you say Seems Like Old Times need to be remade...the pitch perfect Chevy/Goldie chemistry, Grodin's grousing, chicken pepperoni!!!...whatever people...you probably wanted to see J-Lo's Overboard. That being said add Congo as another crap Crichton adaptation that deserved better.

I love the Shadow movie. It's not prefect, but it has a lot of feel of the original material. The effects were decent enough for the time. I think a remake could be good, but I fear they will try to make it too modern. Also, check your fact better, The Phantom and The Shadow were from the 30's era, but the Rocketeer was written as a homage to pulp by Dave Stevens in 1982.

I don't understand the use of the phrase "too 80s" as a criticism of a movie of that era. Would one say "too 50s" or "too 60s" or "too 70s" and so forth? I get it that maybe the 80s haven't fared as well as other decades in the datedness department. However, a good movie is still good, no matter what era it's from. I've heard this applied to great stuff like Michael Mann's Manhunter (would one say this about Drive too, which clearly paid a very 80s tribute to Mann) and Friedkin's To Live and Die in LA, and now I wince at seeing it applied to Tequila Sunrise. TS was awesome. And I just can't see that cast being topped in looks, chemistry or charisma. One of my most favorite movies of that era. Just sounds shallow as movie criticsm.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer deserves a proper remake.

I think it would be great to see a good Sphere movie. I remember reading the book when I was a kid and I couldn't put it down. I was a little disapointed with the movie. I think there are a lot of older movies that could be remade. I watched Lost Horizen recently and think a modern telling would be amazing. I wouldn't remake North by Northwest or anything like that. But some older movies that are in black and white would look great with modern cinemetography.

su-Chang Kong's "R-Point" which is a spooky, atmospheric horror-thriller set in Viet Nam in the early 70's where a group of soldiers go to investigate the disappearance of an earlier squad.