Literal Architecture: 12 Awful Buildings Designed to Look Like Other Things

As proud, card carrying members of the creative class, we know all to well that finding original and intelligent inspiration can be tough, especially in a world where even the most obscure references are a few expert keystrokes away. Yes, keeping up with a well-edited Tumblr dashboard is enough to make your head spin, but still, it’s no excuse for lazy, uninspired design. As with anything, there’s the bad, the ugly, and then, there’s the unforgivable. Let us warn you dear readers: the architecture you are about to see falls definitively in to the latter category.

From a hotel intentionally designed to look like a commonplace salt shaker to the worst, larger than life representation of a fish we’ve ever seen, click through to check out our irreverent roundup of unfortunate design inspiration. Then, take the opportunity to pass a little anonymous judgement and nominate your picks in the comments below!

Holiday Inn inspired by a sugar shaker — Townsville, Australia


Image credit: City Noise; Alibaba

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Worth Noting: UofT's Robart's Library in Toronto, Canada. Was built to look like a peacock. And it's awful.

Can't believe you missed the Longaberger Basket Building in Newark, Ohio. Look it up!

I call shenanigans on this list. It's pretty silly overall, although I happen to think the fish building in India TOTALLY makes sense for a fisheries department. However, as noted by other commenters, the omission of the Longaberger basket building is glaring. As a proud inhabitant of Newark, OH, I am offended and demand to know why our wacky landmark wasn't included.

They forgot to include the Longaberger Basket Company building in Newark, Ohio. A 7-story office building that is billed as the world's largest basket. To see it, just Google Longaberger

@Marv, you know Batman predates the movies, right...?

"Does intention matter?" Yes because if it didn't we wouldn't say "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions". But the issue here should definitely what the architect intended if the article is titled "12 Awful Buildings DESIGNED To Look Like Other Things". Have the fun you want but don't mislead and/or misinform with a title that gives the impression otherwise. The internet is such a propagator of false information. Why add to the confusion?

Since I live in Nashville, I will point out that the AT&T tower was NOT inspired by Batman, since the design of the building PREDATES the first film. The building was finalized about the time that the film came out and the nickname stuck. Reverse order, building first, resemblance second.

Dear Commenters and Fellow Readers, To clear up any and all confusion, @Christopher Reiger is correct. This post is intended as an irreverent aka tongue-in-cheek roundup of buildings that look like other things. Let me now add this disclaimer: the architects behind this collection of buildings may or may not have had said intention. Which brings me to one of my favorite debates... does intention matter? Perhaps Philippe Starck intended the gilded flourish sitting on top of Asahi's headquarters to be a frothy head of beer but it sure doesn't look like one. Any thoughts on intention vs. interpretation?

Many of my fellow commenters don't seem to realize that the author is joking about most of the buildings' inspirations. The Asahi building wasn't designed with sperm in mind and the deYoung Museum architects don't have George Lucas to thank for their design. That said, the Chinese coin, Thai elephant, and Chinese piano-violin buildings make their inspirations oh-so-clear.

"Chang" in Thai means elephant.

I was going to say you misspelled "Awesome", but other commenters already beat me to it!

I can't believe you missed the Smaraldin shopping mall in Rejkavik, Iceland, which from the air looks A LOT like a man's pride and joy: http://forum.ebaumsworld.com/showthread.php?207127-Iceland-shopping-mall-Smaraldin

Someone else has already pointed out that it isn't meant to be a sperm but the foam on the top of a beer, though the building next to it was designed to look like a glass of beer. Also that is the Swiss Hotel, not Namba Parks and I don't think it was meant to look like a playstation. But the actual Namba Parks next to it was designed to look like the caves in the states.

How the hell is #9 awful??? please, someone tell me!

How did the Gehry/Oldenberg binoculars building in Venice, CA not make this list? That's the first one that came to my mind! http://www.westland.net/venicehistory/mapsdocs/new-map35.htm

I don't think you understand the difference between 'desgined to look like' and 'sort of maybe could remind you of'.

Oh, and apparently it's not even supposed to be sperm? Nevermind, I take it back. This article officially has no idea what it's talking about.

I think the author of this article misspelled "awesome." (The sperm one is kind of weird, I'll grant...)

The sugarshaker is at Townsville, not Townsend.

What type of meth are you on, author? Awful? Most of these buildings are not "awful".

Seriously? The craptastic basket building (a Mecca for middle-aged ladies the midwest over) didn't make the list? http://innovativebuildings.net/2010/07/01/the-basket-building/

Wow! The de Young is classified as an awful building and inspired by Star Wars?! Unbelievable. I'm sure the Pritzker Architecture recipients, Herzog and de Mueron, would agree with your assessment. Maybe replace it with the world's largest apple basket. http://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/10658

Yes, JMM. It's a drop of delicious beer. Sorry Flavorwire. And as an added bonus, there is a wonderful truck-driver's cafe within its shadow.

The Asahi building (or "Golden Poop" as it's known in Tokyo) is actually supposed to be the foam blowing off the top of a freshly opened can of beer - the building being the can of beer.