10 ‘Unfilmable’ Books That Made It to the Big Screen

Some books, critics say, are simply unfilmable. And it’s true — until, of course, they get filmed. This year, we feel like we can’t turn around without running into a new film adaptation of a book that has, until now, been generally agreed to be too stylistically complex, too structurally strange, too epic in proportion for the big screen. While we’re still waiting on Pale Fire and 100 Years of Solitude, we’re getting two in the next two weeks alone: Cloud Atlas and Midnight’s Children. Inspired by this turn of events, we’ve put together a list of a few supposedly unfilmable books that have been adapted into films against all odds — some with great success, and others with, well, less success. Read our list after the jump, and add your own unfilmable favorites in the comments!

Cloud Atlas

“As I was writing Cloud Atlas,” David Mitchell told The New Yorker, “I thought, ‘It’s a shame this is unfilmable.’” And he’s not just being modest. Indeed, the book seems a tough sell for adaptation — as you probably know by now, even if you haven’t read it, the structure is like that of a mirrored pyramid or a circle: the six storylines build chronologically towards the pinnacle of the furthest future, then march back down the other side, the book ending with the second half of the story the reader began some 500 pages before. But the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer, with some small (okay, enormous) tweaks in structure, managed to make it work — and the result is pretty astounding.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I'm still astounded by the end of Kundera's The Incredible Lightness of Being. How, how, HOW will a film get across the end: "She was experiencing the same odd happiness and odd sadness as then. The sadness meant: we are at the last station. The happiness meant: we are together. The sadness was form, the happiness content. Happiness filled the space of sadness." How the hell? And yet, the rain, the fade-out, the wipers were so perfect and profound. It still makes me gasp when I think about it.

The Hours - Michael Cunningham

I'm surprised not to see "Catch-22" on this list. The novel is told completely out of order, has tons of characters, and is filled with linguistic tricks. All things very hard to capture in film. While Mike Nichols' version pales to the book, there is a lot to recommend it on it's own. It's beautiful to look at and epic in scope. It manages, surprisingly, to capture the lack of chronology practically creating its own cinematic language (much like the book did). Last, it features about every actor (alas, virtually no actresses) who was alive in 1970. I also second "Fear & Loathing In Las Vegas."

The French Lieutenant's Woman... Yet Harold Pinter managed the impossible.

The Sheltering Sky

What about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy? I still have a hard time believing that a filmed adaptation of it even exists.

The Road and like one of the earlier posters I kept expecting to see Fear and Loathing. Also never would have thought Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep could turn into Bladerunner.

Cant believe no one has said The Lovely Bones! Great book, TERRIBLE movie adaption!

LA Confidential is a highly successful adaptation of what most considered an unadaptable novel. Much like Naked Lunch it succeeds b/c it doesn't try and be faithful to the plot as it does the spirit of the book (a reason why Watchmen failed as badly as it did). Also, @jeri: Short Cuts shouldn't count b/c that wasn't an actual book before it was adapted. It was just several stories from various Carver collections that Altman loosely adapted. Still quite the achievement, but I don't think it qualifies here.

love in the time of cholera - just awful!

finnegan's wake - now that is the ultimate unfilmable book

Can't believe there is no mention of "Short Cuts"!

rene daumal's wonderfully odd and sadly unfinished mount analogue springs too mind. alejandro jodorowsky's holy mountain is an breathtaking interpretation - my favourite film of all time.

you forgot american psycho!

Nabokov did indeed say, 'poshlost.' And also most novels by Stephen King, but especially "Dreamcatcher".

Another one coming out in the weeks to come: Life of Pi.

The His Dark Materials Trilogy by Philip Pullman comes to mind. The first book was made into a film but it was a huge flop, too much CGI and not enough focus on what made the books great, the narrative.

I know its not a movie, but george r r marten wrote game of thrones specifically so that it wouldn't be adapted to tv bc he was so sick of the industry

adaptation! no one thought the orchid thief could be adapted

On the Road is TERRIBLE. Do yourself a favor and skip it.

lord of the rings was considered too difficult to film in live action.

I think Nabokov said "poshlust."

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas