10 Great Authors We Should All Stop Pigeonholing

This week, we read a great article at Slate about Ursula K. Le Guin and the genre distinctions (or lack thereof) in her work. This article portends an even greater event, the publication of Le Guin’s new self-chosen best-of collection, The Unreal and the Real, later this month, so we’ve decided to take a look at Le Guin and other authors who have found themselves neatly boxed and categorized by the collective consciousness — but shouldn’t be. Click through to check out a few great authors we should all really stop pigeonholing, and if we’ve missed one, add to our list in the comments!

Ursula K. Le Guin

Le Guin is known (and well-revered) for her science fiction, but her more realistic mode is often unfairly ignored. In her new collection, The Unreal and the Real, she titles the first volume Where on Earth and the second Outer Space, Inner Lands — “I think the two titles are sufficiently descriptive and need no further explanation,” she writes in the introduction to the first volume. “Some people will identify the first volume as “mundane” and the second as “science fiction,” but they will be wrong.” Indeed — there’s nothing mundane about these stories. Here’s hoping the collection will open a few new eyes to another of Le Guin’s many talents.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Michael Walsh -- true, most Verne translations have been crap, but most Verne translations, since a new wave of them began in the 1980s or so, have been hugely better. Entry I wrote in the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction at http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/verne_jules is as complete as I know how at the moment (new stuff keeps coming in) and a lot of good translations are given in the Checklist

Why do I find the old jingle "SF's no good", they bellow 'til we're deaf. "But, THIS is good." "Well, then it's not SF." running through my mind? A thought which also applies to mystery and other genre stories as well. Why not simply recognize that good writing is good writing, regardless of where you find it? (Well, that and recognize that space opera and the like are types of SF, but hardly the whole thing which also includes imaginings like The Lathe of Heaven, taking us neatly back to Le Guin.)

The problem for any reader of Jules Verne has is that for over a century most translations have been utter crap.

I weary of these condescending little pats on the head from readers of "real literature" that use the pejorative sneer-term "sci-fi" to dismiss the literature of actual imagination and intelligence, presumably in favor of introspective meta-self-referencing litrachah, but occasionally let some us sit at the big table as long as we know our place and can be mined for genre-bashing quotes (as long as you ignore what a LeGuin, for example, has to say about the topic).

Some may sneer but, I would add Stephen King to this list.

Good list, though it is definitely missing John LeCarre - often pigeonholed as a spy novelist or thrown into the same category as Tom Clancy. His books are all brilliant and quite literary.

Yet again, mystery writers get chucked to the side. How about Ruth Rendell/Barbara Vine? Or Henning Mankell?

For the uninitiated, Switch Bitch is a fun adult collection by Roald Dahl.

I absolutely agree with every single person on this list. I haven't read all of the authors or all of the works of the authors I have read, but authors do get pigeon-holed, modern or not. I would even dare to add F. Scott Fitzgerald to this list. Most of America has probably read The Great Gatsby, but what about his other works? He wrote wonderful, magical fiction.

@Kdizzle: Would you relax?

People pigeonhole Le Guin as a Science Fiction and Fantasy writer because she is a fucking Science Fiction and Fantasy writer. One that is so fantastic that she really transcends both genres, but still remains firmly within them. The Dispossessed isn't just one of the greatest goddamn Science Fiction novels of the twentieth century, its one of the greatest American novels of the twentieth century period. And it just happens to be a Science Fiction novel. Is there some sort shame in the moniker? Does it cause smug, pretentious snobs to wretch at her work when if the moniker were removed they would naturally gravitate toward it? If the answer is yes than fuck you. Go read more Sylvia Plath and drink another glass of chardonnay.