10 of the Most Gloriously Frustrating Endings in Literature

There’s been an interesting back-and-forth happening in the books section of the Guardian’s website this week, catalyzed by the publication of a kinda vapid blog post about how “narratives that finish without resolving their plots… are unending torture for readers.” If that premise annoys you, you’re not the only one, and sure enough, yesterday the paper published another post rebutting the initial argument. At Flavorpill, we tend to fall into the camp who love a good ambiguous ending, so here are a few of our favorites, endings we’ve found either thrilling, maddening or just thought-provoking — what are yours? (And, of course, the very nature of this post means that spoilers obviously abound, so if you see the cover of a book/play/etc you haven’t read, proceed at your own risk!)

Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace

Apart from the consistently brilliant prose, the bewildering array of characters and Wallace’s singular sense of humor, perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Infinite Jest is that it’s a 1,000+ page novel wherein the most important events to the narrative never actually get narrated. We can understand why readers might feel cheated after slogging through all those pages, plus the innumerable footnotes, only to be confronted with “…and the tide was way out” rather than any sort of resolution — if anything, though, it made us want to return to the start of the book and start reading again.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I would add Her Fearful Symmetry by Audrey Niffenegger.  After finishing, a friend and I spent 30 minutes thinking up 5 different endings that would have been more interesting/satisfying than the one delivered.

ColetteBezuidenhout 5 pts

I would add Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid's Tale' - what ha[[ens to her, did she ever actually escape or was she caught? And the 'diary analysis' doesn't answer anything either!

I have to add Henry James's "Turn of the Screw". Were there really ghosts or not???? What did they actually do to the kids??? Also "Villette" by Charlotte Bronte for a just plain miserable ending.

@David - yeah, I think that's probably because no-one's ever actually got to the end :)

I've never heard anyone complain about the ambiguity in the ending of Proust's 'A la recherche du temps perdu'. It ends on the same word (or phrase) that it began with 2,000 pages earlier . . . but is that really the end of it? Is that the end of time? Maybe it's because no one has actually got to the end (I skipped ahead) that there is so little frustration registered for this culprit!

Hmm, you seemed to have missed the point of 'gloriously frustrating endings' by citing all sorts of simply ambiguous endings that you like for their ambiguity. Where's the frustration? Almost all of your examples, apart from the first, miss that element. I'd suggest Hawthorne's 'The Marble Faun' where we spend the entire novel being feed ominous suggestions about a 'dark secret' that explains why a mysterious monk has been stalking the central character and why he has 'a secret power' over her. And then . . . nothing. Never explained. The monk is pushed off a cliff and the novel's only concern is whether the heroine should feel guilty for having killed him (or having let her admirer kill him actually). Well, we can't bloody answer that question unless we know WHAT was the secret power he had over her? Now THAT's frustrating!

Thank God. Someone else who was underwhelmed by Life of Pi. Thought I was the only one...

I'd like to highlight that there's no 'frustrating ending' when it can be ambiguous or just open. The author tells a story and the reader is the one to turn on all his fantasies for he is supposed to get involved. Readers end up novels or stories because they take an active participation which is the consequence of a personal interpretation. A book is a mystery that a writer tells but without readers there are no plots or endings absolutely finished. Reading should make you think, reflex, relate with past experiences of readers, their prejudices and so on. Such process is guided by the author but the reader has rhe powerful decision of the very ending of the story. Nobody else's.

What about THE SENSE OF AN ENDING (Julian Barnes)? Lots of debate around here over that one.

@Cormack - yes, quite possibly, but the book never specifies what happens, so any interpretation is exactly that: an interpretation

"Corelli's Mandolin" has an infuriating ending. And what a book! One of my favorite characters ever, some truly wonderful writing, a moving and honest story, and then thbbbbbbb. Not to mention almost everything that Neal Stephenson has written. Wonderful books, no idea how to wrap them up.

The ending of Blood Meridian isn't ambiguous-- the Judge rapes the kid and kills him. Read any work of criticism on it.

@Debra The Dark Tower (not Black) and disagree. After all the build up, frankly, no other ending would have sufficed. The cop out was the post-ending-all-is-well-with-the-others ending. Roland's resolution - or, rather, lack of it, was pretty much perfect because it was the only thing that would be as big as the story.

Special Topics in Calamity Physics by Marisha Pessl. The critics raved and the New York Times named it one of the best books of 2006. But the ending was so atrocious that I'm still bitching about it six years later.

@Spencer - ah yessssss to "The Man in the High Castle"

I'd throw "The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym" into the list.

'The Man in the High Castle' left me wanting a whole second book.

So glad I'm not the only one who didn't love Life of Pi. I felt like I was missing something that everyone else 'got' but I just didn't enjoy it. I didn't even get to the ending...

What about the "Crying of Lot 49" by Pynchon?

@Debra - disagree! While some of the characters' endings were frustrating, the whole series was about the possibility of redemption. Roland's ending leads you to believe change is possible and that redemption is worth fighting for. Out of the whole Ka-Tet, his ending was the most fitting.

For Whom the Bell Tolls. The textbook definition of an ambiguous ending. Does the wounded Robert Jordan manage to shoot the enemy officer and some soldiers, then commit suicide before he can be captured and tortured, as we'd like to believe? Or does it go down some other way? We'll never know since Hemingway ends it seconds before the decisive moment.

@Debra - I haven't finished them yet!

I can't believe you left out the whole damn Black Tower series by Stephen King. Hardly a classic, I realize, but I devoured all eight books of that tale only to find myself right back at the beginning. what a cop out. I lost a lot of respect for Mr. king as a story teller.

Good picks all but man oh man evelyn waugh's a handful of dust makes me crazy. I read it again recently. I love it but wow what a cruel crazy ending! yes - gloriously frustrating indeed.

What about American Psycho?

Of course, the whole point is that you want to start reading it again; just as people are compelled to perpetually re-watch The Entertainment.

The Dice Man - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dice_Man I had to check if I hadn't lost the last pages. I hadn't.

@bzgea2 - well, yeah, but I'm talking about the ending of the novel, not the chronological ending of its narrative. But yes, you're right, that's certainly the end of the story in terms of its timeline

I guess you would be disappointed in the ending of Infinite Jest if you thought that was the actual ending of the book. I've always assumed the opening with Hal in the college interview was the actual ending of the book in terms of the timeline of the novel.

what about the ending to Beautiful Thing?