10 Supergroups That Were Less Than the Sum of Their Parts

This week sees the release of Amok, the debut album by Thom Yorke’s much-heralded Atoms for Peace project. The album sets Yorke with an unlikely cast of collaborators: Flea, long-time producer Nigel Godrich, REM drummer Joey Waronker, and a Brazilian multi-instrumentalist by the name of Mauro Refosco. They’re a supergroup, basically, no matter how much Yorke decries the term. And like many supergroups, they prove less than the sum of their parts — getting the idea of putting a bunch of successful musicians together to work is more difficult than it seems. For proof, check out this selection of other supergroups who didn’t quite live up to the promise of their membership, along the way demonstrating some of the problems that plague the entire concept.

Atoms for Peace

Here’s the thing with Atoms for Peace: they’re not bad. If anything, they’re too good for their own good. The music is produced beautifully, played flawlessly — but it feels too polished, like it’s a mental exercise for highly accomplished replicants or something. Compared to Yorke’s “other” band, it lacks some sort of soul; Radiohead, after all, are also excellent musicians, but they imbue their records with a tinge of emotion that’s missing here. The whole thing demonstrates a problem with supergroups: assembling a whole bunch of hyper-talented musicians doesn’t guarantee a creative spark, any more than assembling a bunch of really attractive people makes for good conversation.

Filed Under:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
nixskits2 11 pts

Temple Of The Dog might not have been a 'supergroup' to most, but they recorded one very respectable album, with Chris Cornell's and  Eddie Vedder's vocals making Hunger Strike and Say Hello 2 Heaven some tunes from the nineties I have fond memories of. Ideal lineup for one band we'll never get to see or hear: Jimi Hendrix, John Bonham, Cliff Burton and Ronnie James Dio!

saulissimo 5 pts

Agreed.  The Traveling Wilburys were less than the sum of its historical parts.  But the various collaborations proved to be very successful if you look at the contemporary parts.  George Harrison's records were mostly worthless after All Things Must Pass (1970), ELO's great songs were all from the 70s, Roy Orbison became a non-entity after Pretty Woman (1964) and we all know about Bob's decade long slump.

 

Then when these folks start collaborating with each other we start seeing some of the old brilliance return.  Harrison's Cloud Nine (1987) was decent. Orbison's comeback was extremely welcome. And there were a host of inspired songs coming out of the Wilburys themselves.  I am not a Petty fan but Full Moon Fever (1989) suggests the collaborations also helped him step up his game.

 

I would argue that the Wilburys didn't improve Bob Dylan's situation.  He needed another 10 years of wandering by himself.